What is the expected result of a glucose test on the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of a patient with suspected bacterial meningitis?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 6, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

CSF Glucose in Bacterial Meningitis

In a 14-year-old boy with fever, vomiting, lethargy, neck stiffness, and cloudy CSF with elevated WBC count, the expected glucose result would be decreased (option B).

CSF Findings in Bacterial Meningitis

Bacterial meningitis typically presents with characteristic CSF abnormalities:

  • Glucose: Decreased in approximately 50-60% of patients with bacterial meningitis 1
  • CSF:Serum glucose ratio: A ratio <0.4 has 80% sensitivity and 98% specificity for bacterial meningitis in children over 12 months 1
  • Cell count: The patient's CSF shows 100 cells with cloudy appearance, consistent with bacterial meningitis which typically shows 100-5,000 cells/mm³ (though can range from 100-110,000 cells/mm³) 1

Diagnostic Value of CSF Glucose

The UK Joint Specialist Societies guideline states that in bacterial meningitis:

  • CSF glucose is typically very low 1
  • Normal CSF glucose is about two-thirds of plasma glucose 1
  • A CSF:plasma glucose ratio cutoff of 0.36 has 93% sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing bacterial meningitis 1
  • A CSF glucose above 2.6 mmol/L is unlikely to be associated with bacterial meningitis 1

Comparison with Other Meningitis Types

Different types of meningitis show characteristic CSF glucose patterns:

Type CSF Glucose CSF:Plasma Glucose Ratio
Normal 2.6-4.5 mmol/L >0.66
Bacterial Very low Very low
Viral Normal/slightly low Normal/slightly low
Tuberculous Very low Very low
Fungal Low Low
Lyme Normal to slightly low Normal (>0.66)

1, 2

Clinical Significance

Low CSF glucose in bacterial meningitis has prognostic implications:

  • A CSF:plasma glucose ratio of 0.1-0.35 is associated with higher mortality compared to ratios of 0.38-2.0 3
  • Recent research confirms that CSF:blood glucose ratio is a precise predictor of bacterial meningitis (optimal cutoff=0.36, sensitivity=92.9%, specificity=92.9%) 4
  • Low CSF glucose levels have been associated with sensorineural hearing loss in bacterial meningitis caused by S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae 5

Diagnostic Algorithm

  1. Obtain CSF and blood glucose simultaneously
  2. Calculate CSF:blood glucose ratio
  3. If ratio <0.36, strongly suspect bacterial meningitis 4
  4. Consider point-of-care glucometer testing which can provide rapid results (within 5 minutes) with good sensitivity (94.1%) and specificity (91%) using a cutoff ratio of 0.46 6

Common Pitfalls

  • Relying solely on absolute CSF glucose values without calculating the CSF:serum ratio
  • Not obtaining a simultaneous blood glucose sample
  • Failing to recognize that partially treated bacterial meningitis may have less pronounced glucose abnormalities
  • Overlooking that tuberculous meningitis can also present with very low CSF glucose

In conclusion, based on the clinical presentation (fever, vomiting, lethargy, neck stiffness) and CSF findings (cloudy appearance, elevated WBC count), this 14-year-old boy most likely has bacterial meningitis, and the expected CSF glucose result would be decreased.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Lyme Meningitis Diagnosis and Differentiation

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Cerebrospinal fluid/blood glucose ratio as an indicator for bacterial meningitis.

The American journal of emergency medicine, 2014

Research

Rapid detection of bacterial meningitis using a point-of-care glucometer.

European journal of emergency medicine : official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine, 2019

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.