Causes of Post-PCI CTO Ejection Fraction Reduction
The primary causes of ejection fraction (EF) reduction after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for chronic total occlusion (CTO) include no-reflow phenomenon, distal embolization, side-branch occlusion, coronary perforation, and periprocedural myocardial infarction.
No-Reflow Phenomenon
No-reflow is one of the most common mechanisms leading to EF reduction after CTO-PCI. It occurs in two distinct forms:
Interventional no-reflow: This is attributed to:
- Vasospasm
- Downstream embolization of debris dislodged during PCI
- More common during atherectomy, in the presence of thrombus, or with degenerated saphenous vein grafts 1
Suboptimal reperfusion: Characterized by:
- Endothelial injury
- Embolization
- Vasospasm
- Manifests as abnormal TIMI frame counts and TIMI blush scores 1
The principal clinical consequence of no-reflow is myonecrosis, which can directly impact left ventricular function.
Periprocedural Myocardial Infarction
CTO-PCI carries a higher risk of periprocedural myocardial infarction compared to non-CTO PCI, which can lead to EF reduction:
- Elevated cardiac biomarkers (CK-MB) post-procedure indicate myocardial injury
- Even low-level elevations of CK-MB are associated with increased intermediate and long-term risks 1
- CK-MB index increase of more than 5 times the upper limit of normal should be treated as signifying an MI 1
Procedural Complications
Several procedural complications during CTO-PCI can lead to EF reduction:
1. Coronary Perforation
- Occurs in approximately 6.6% of CTO-PCI cases 2
- Risk factors include:
- Advanced age
- Female gender
- Previous coronary artery bypass graft
- Blunt stump
- Proximal cap ambiguity
- Moderate-severe calcification 2
- Technical success is lower in patients with perforations (69% vs 85%) 2
2. Side-Branch Occlusion
- Occurs in 8% to 80% of unselected patients during bifurcation PCI
- More common with complex bifurcation morphology
- Associated with Q-wave and non-Q-wave MI 1
3. Donor Vessel Injury
- During retrograde approaches, injury to the donor vessel providing collaterals can occur
- Can lead to compromised blood flow to previously viable myocardium 1
Patient-Related Factors
Certain patient characteristics are associated with higher risk of EF reduction after CTO-PCI:
Reduced baseline EF: Patients with already reduced EF (≤35%) have higher in-hospital mortality (1.1% vs 0.3% for those with EF ≥50%) 3
Comorbidities: Diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, and multi-vessel disease are associated with worse outcomes 4
Left main disease: Associated with higher incidence of cardiac death post-procedure 4
Preventive Strategies
To minimize the risk of EF reduction after CTO-PCI:
Pharmacological interventions for no-reflow:
- Intracoronary vasodilators (adenosine, calcium channel blockers, or nitroprusside) are reasonable to treat PCI-related no-reflow (Class IIa recommendation) 1
Procedural considerations:
Technical expertise:
Monitoring and Management
Post-procedure evaluation:
Imaging follow-up:
- Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) can help assess improvement in EF and left ventricular volumes after CTO-PCI 5
Clinical Implications
Despite the risks of EF reduction, successful CTO-PCI has been associated with:
Improved left ventricular function in patients with heart failure and reduced EF:
Reduced mortality:
In conclusion, while there are several mechanisms that can lead to EF reduction after CTO-PCI, successful revascularization generally leads to improved EF and better clinical outcomes when performed by experienced operators with appropriate patient selection.