Is ionizing radiation a known cause of atrial fibrillation?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 10, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Ionizing Radiation and Atrial Fibrillation: Current Evidence

There is no substantial evidence in current medical literature supporting ionizing radiation as a direct cause of atrial fibrillation. The available guidelines and research do not establish a causal relationship between radiation exposure and the development of atrial fibrillation.

Radiation Effects on Cardiac Tissue

While ionizing radiation has documented effects on various body tissues, the current medical literature does not specifically identify atrial fibrillation as a known consequence of radiation exposure. The 2018 ACC/HRS/NASCI/SCAI/SCCT expert consensus document on ionizing radiation in cardiovascular imaging discusses several potential cardiac effects of radiation but does not list atrial fibrillation among them 1:

  • Documented cardiac tissue reactions to radiation include:
    • Damage to myocardium
    • Cardiac valve damage
    • Coronary artery damage

These effects typically occur only above certain threshold doses and with a time delay between exposure and manifestation of tissue injury.

Known Health Modifiers Causing Atrial Fibrillation

The 2016 expert consensus document on defining major health modifiers causing atrial fibrillation 1 identifies several established mechanisms for AF development, but does not include radiation exposure among them:

  • Established causes and contributors to AF include:
    • Atrial fibrosis
    • Abnormal calcium handling
    • Ion-channel dysfunction (genetic or acquired)
    • Autonomic dysfunction
    • Increased oxidative stress
    • microRNA-mediated dysregulation
    • Paracrine fat-cell activity

Radiation Exposure in AF Treatment

Interestingly, while radiation is not established as a cause of AF, patients with AF are often exposed to ionizing radiation during diagnostic and treatment procedures:

  • Patients undergoing radiofrequency ablation for AF receive radiation from:

    • Pre-procedural CT scans (contributing approximately 82% of total radiation exposure) 2
    • Fluoroscopy during the ablation procedure
  • The mean cumulative effective dose for patients undergoing AF ablation is approximately 11.4 mSv 2

  • Obesity significantly increases radiation exposure during AF treatment procedures, with obese patients receiving doses approximately 75% higher than normal-weight patients 2

Radiation Reduction Strategies in AF Treatment

Given concerns about radiation exposure, several techniques have been developed to reduce radiation during AF treatment:

  • Non-fluoroscopic three-dimensional mapping systems can significantly reduce radiation exposure during catheter ablation 3

  • Ultrasound-guided approaches can potentially eliminate the need for pre-procedural CT scans, reducing radiation exposure by approximately 10 mSv per AF catheter ablation 4

  • Novel catheter tracking systems have demonstrated significant reductions in radiation exposure:

    • 61% reduction for AF ablation
    • 90% reduction for atrial flutter ablation 5

Conclusion

While ionizing radiation exposure is a concern during diagnostic and therapeutic procedures for atrial fibrillation, current medical literature does not support radiation as a causative factor for the development of atrial fibrillation itself. The focus of research has been on reducing radiation exposure during AF treatment rather than investigating radiation as a potential cause of the condition.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.