What is the best method to evaluate hearing in a 2-month-old infant?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 11, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Best Method to Evaluate Hearing in a 2-Month-Old Infant

For a 2-month-old infant, the optimal method to evaluate hearing is a combination of Automated Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR) and Otoacoustic Emissions (OAEs) testing. 1 These objective tests are specifically designed for infants under 9 months of age and provide ear-specific results without requiring patient cooperation.

Recommended Testing Approach for 2-Month-Olds

Primary Testing Methods:

  1. Automated Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR)

    • Involves placing electrodes on the infant's head to detect neurological responses to auditory stimuli
    • Can test each ear individually
    • Provides ear-specific results
    • Can detect hearing loss greater than 40 dB 2
    • Takes approximately 15 minutes to complete 2
    • Advantages: Not dependent on whether infant is awake or asleep 2
  2. Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions (OAEs)

    • Involves placing a small probe with a sensitive microphone in the ear canal
    • Measures sounds produced by the cochlea's hair cells in response to stimulation
    • Takes approximately 10 minutes 2
    • Provides ear-specific results
    • Advantages: Quick test time, non-invasive 2

Important Considerations

Testing Conditions:

  • The infant must remain relatively inactive during testing 2
  • For ABR, sedation may be necessary if motion artifacts interfere with results 2
  • Testing environment should be quiet with minimal distractions 1

Limitations to Be Aware Of:

  • OAEs are very sensitive to middle-ear effusions and cerumen or vernix in the ear canal 2
  • Neither ABR nor OAE are true tests of hearing, as they assess auditory pathway structural integrity but not cortical processing of sound 2, 1
  • Using only one method may miss certain types of hearing loss; a two-stage protocol is recommended 3

Follow-up Recommendations:

  • If the infant fails initial screening, comprehensive audiological evaluation should be completed by 3 months of age 1
  • Infants with risk factors for hearing loss should have at least one diagnostic audiological assessment by 24-30 months, even if they passed newborn screening 1

Advantages of Combined Approach

Using both ABR and OAE provides complementary information:

  • ABR evaluates the neural pathway up to the brainstem
  • OAEs assess cochlear function specifically
  • Combined testing increases sensitivity for detecting various types of hearing loss

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  1. Relying solely on one test method

    • Research shows approximately 23% of infants with permanent hearing loss at 9 months would pass the A-ABR alone 3
    • Many A-ABR devices are designed to identify moderate or greater hearing loss, potentially missing mild cases 3
  2. Inadequate follow-up

    • 13-31% of infants who fail initial screening do not return for definitive testing 1
    • Ensure proper follow-up protocols are in place
  3. Improper testing conditions

    • External ear canal obstruction (collapsed ear canal or debris) accounts for 84% of newborns who fail OAE testing 4
    • Proper otoscopic examination should be performed if initial testing fails

By implementing this combined ABR and OAE approach for a 2-month-old infant, you can effectively evaluate hearing status and identify potential hearing impairments early, allowing for timely intervention and improved outcomes.

References

Guideline

Pediatric Ear Assessment Guidelines

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Otological evaluation of newborns who failed otoacoustic emission screening.

Journal of basic and clinical physiology and pharmacology, 1999

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.