What is the Child-Pugh (liver disease severity scoring system) score?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 11, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Child-Pugh Score: A Vital Tool for Assessing Liver Disease Severity

The Child-Pugh score is an empiric scoring system that classifies patients with chronic liver disease into three classes (A-C) according to likelihood of survival, providing a rough estimate of liver function by categorizing patients as having compensated (class A) or decompensated (classes B and C) cirrhosis. 1

Components of the Child-Pugh Score

The Child-Pugh score incorporates five parameters:

Laboratory Parameters (Objective):

  • Serum albumin
  • Serum bilirubin
  • Prothrombin time/INR

Clinical Parameters (Subjective):

  • Hepatic encephalopathy
  • Ascites

Scoring System

Each parameter is scored 1-3 points, with higher scores indicating worse function:

Parameter 1 point 2 points 3 points
Albumin (g/dL) >3.5 2.8-3.5 <2.8
Bilirubin (mg/dL) <2 2-3 >3
PT (seconds prolonged) or INR <4 or <1.7 4-6 or 1.7-2.3 >6 or >2.3
Ascites None Mild/Controlled Moderate-Severe/Refractory
Encephalopathy None Grade 1-2 Grade 3-4

Classification and Interpretation

  • Class A: 5-6 points (compensated cirrhosis)
  • Class B: 7-9 points (moderate functional compromise)
  • Class C: 10-15 points (decompensated cirrhosis)

This classification correlates with 1-year survival rates:

  • Class A: 100%
  • Class B: 80%
  • Class C: 45%

Clinical Applications

The Child-Pugh score is used for:

  1. Assessing prognosis in cirrhotic patients
  2. Determining candidacy for liver transplantation
  3. Guiding treatment decisions for hepatocellular carcinoma
  4. Evaluating surgical risk in cirrhotic patients
  5. Predicting complications of portal hypertension

Advantages and Limitations

Advantages:

  • Easy to perform at bedside
  • Includes both laboratory and clinical parameters
  • Well-established prognostic value
  • Useful for long-term prognosis (1-5 years) 2

Limitations:

  • Includes subjective assessments (ascites, encephalopathy)
  • Does not include renal function (an important prognostic factor)
  • Limited sensitivity for short-term mortality prediction
  • Does not account for other important factors like portal hypertension

Comparison with MELD Score

The Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score is an alternative scoring system that:

  • Uses only objective laboratory values (bilirubin, creatinine, INR)
  • Includes renal function assessment
  • Better predicts short-term (3-month) mortality
  • Is used for liver transplant allocation by UNOS

However, the Child-Pugh score remains valuable for clinical assessment at the bedside and for long-term prognostication 1, 2, 3.

Clinical Pearls

  • A more recent version of the Child-Pugh score incorporates INR instead of prothrombin time 1
  • The Child-Pugh score should be supplemented with assessment for portal hypertension (varices, splenomegaly, thrombocytopenia) 1
  • In some settings, modified versions of the Child-Pugh score (adding creatinine) perform similarly to MELD 4
  • The Child-Pugh score remains a cornerstone of liver disease assessment despite newer scoring systems 3

Remember that while the Child-Pugh score is valuable for overall assessment of liver function, treatment decisions should consider additional factors specific to the clinical scenario and underlying liver disease etiology.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.