What are common chest wall deformities?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 11, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Common Chest Wall Deformities

The most common chest wall deformities are pectus excavatum (funnel chest) accounting for approximately 88% of cases, followed by pectus carinatum (pigeon chest) at about 5% of cases. 1, 2, 3

Types of Chest Wall Deformities

Congenital Deformities

  1. Pectus Excavatum (Funnel Chest)

    • Depression of the anterior chest wall
    • Often associated with other skeletal abnormalities including straight thoracic spine
    • May be a feature in connective tissue disorders like Marfan syndrome and Noonan syndrome 4
    • Can cause both physiological and psychological impacts on patients
  2. Pectus Carinatum (Pigeon Chest)

    • Protrusion deformity of the sternum
    • Primarily a cosmetic concern but can cause significant psychological distress 2
  3. Flail Chest/Chest Wall Instability

    • Characterized by paradoxical movement of a chest wall segment during respiration
    • Can be congenital or acquired (more commonly from trauma)
    • Rare in congenital form 5
  4. Rib Abnormalities

    • Rib crowding
    • Horizontal positioning of ribs (often resulting from collapsed thoracic vertebrae)
    • Associated with conditions like osteogenesis imperfecta 5

Acquired Deformities

  1. Post-surgical deformities

    • Following thoracotomy or sternotomy
    • Can include sternal nonunion and dehiscence 5
  2. Post-traumatic deformities

    • Following rib fractures or flail chest injuries
    • Can lead to long-term respiratory impairment 5
  3. Radiation-induced changes

    • Following radiation therapy for lung or chest wall tumors
    • Can lead to chest wall edema, cortical thinning, and eventual rib fractures 5

Clinical Significance

Physiological Impact

  • Respiratory effects:

    • Restrictive lung disease pattern
    • Decreased vital capacity
    • Paradoxical breathing in severe cases 5
    • Breathing impairments often due to altered thoracic kinematics 5
  • Cardiovascular effects:

    • Cardiac compression in severe pectus excavatum
    • Potential association with aortic root dilation in Marfan syndrome 4
    • Hemodynamic effects requiring surgical correction in some cases

Psychological Impact

  • Body image concerns
  • Social development issues
  • Psychological distress that may warrant intervention even in the absence of physiological compromise 4, 6

Diagnostic Approach

Imaging Modalities

  1. Chest Radiography

    • Initial screening tool
    • Can identify structural abnormalities of sternum, ribs, and thoracic spine
    • Limited in precise localization and characterization 5
  2. CT Scan

    • Gold standard for evaluation of chest wall deformities
    • Allows precise characterization of anatomy and degree of deformity
    • Useful for surgical planning
    • 3D reconstructions provide valuable information for patient education and surgical planning 7
    • Can assess degree of healing and residual deformities post-treatment 5
  3. MRI

    • Superior soft tissue contrast
    • Useful for evaluating associated soft tissue abnormalities
    • Particularly valuable for post-treatment evaluation and recurrence detection 5
  4. Ultrasound

    • Limited role in primary evaluation
    • May help evaluate associated pleural or diaphragmatic complications 5

Management Considerations

Indications for Intervention

  • Cardiopulmonary compromise
  • Significant respiratory limitations affecting quality of life
  • Significant psychological impact affecting quality of life 4
  • Progressive deformity

Treatment Options

  1. Non-surgical approaches

    • Bracing for mild to moderate pectus carinatum
    • Physical therapy for associated musculoskeletal issues
  2. Surgical approaches

    • Minimally Invasive Repair of Pectus Excavatum (MIRPE/Nuss procedure)

      • Thoracoscopic placement of temporary metal bar behind sternum
      • Shorter procedure length and excellent cosmetic results 6
    • Modified Ravitch procedure

      • Open surgical approach
      • Involves resection of abnormal costal cartilages and sternal osteotomy

Special Considerations

  • In patients with associated connective tissue disorders like Marfan syndrome:
    • Cardiovascular management takes precedence over pectus repair
    • Delay surgical repair if aortic root dilation is approaching surgical thresholds (≥4.5 cm) 4
    • Regular cardiovascular monitoring is essential

Pitfalls and Caveats

  • Chest wall deformities can be mistaken for chest masses on imaging
  • Proper patient selection is critical for optimal surgical outcomes
  • Timing of intervention is important - treating patients before adulthood increases success rates 3
  • Respiratory impairment in conditions like osteogenesis imperfecta may be independent of the degree of scoliosis or chest wall deformity 5
  • Post-radiation chest wall complications may develop months to years after treatment 5

References

Research

Chest wall deformities in pediatric surgery.

The Surgical clinics of North America, 2012

Research

Chest wall deformities.

Pediatrics in review, 1989

Research

Overview of chest wall deformities.

Turk gogus kalp damar cerrahisi dergisi, 2024

Guideline

Pectus Excavatum Diagnosis and Treatment

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum.

Journal of visualized surgery, 2016

Research

Imaging of congenital chest wall deformities.

The British journal of radiology, 2016

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.