What is Median Arcuate Ligament Syndrome (MALS)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 12, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Median Arcuate Ligament Syndrome (MALS)

Median Arcuate Ligament Syndrome (MALS) is a rare condition characterized by external compression of the celiac artery by the median arcuate ligament, causing postprandial abdominal pain, nausea, weight loss, and food aversion due to a combination of vascular compression and neurogenic factors involving the celiac plexus. 1, 2

Definition and Anatomy

  • The median arcuate ligament is a fibrous band connecting the right and left hemidiaphragms that is present in everyone
  • Celiac axis narrowing due to this ligament occurs in approximately 20% of the general population 1, 2
  • Most cases of compression are asymptomatic due to collateral circulation from the superior mesenteric artery

Pathophysiology

MALS has a multifactorial etiology with two primary mechanisms:

  1. Vascular mechanism: External compression of the celiac artery limiting blood flow to the bowel, resulting in ischemic symptoms 1
  2. Neurogenic mechanism: Irritation of the celiac ganglion causing neuropathic pain 1, 3

Clinical Presentation

Typical symptoms include:

  • Postprandial epigastric pain (most common)
  • Nausea and vomiting
  • Weight loss (often significant, up to 20 pounds)
  • Food aversion (sitophobia)
  • Abdominal pain exacerbated by exercise 3, 4

Diagnostic Approach

MALS is a diagnosis of exclusion. The American College of Radiology recommends:

  1. CT angiography (CTA): First-line imaging to identify celiac stenosis, showing characteristic "J-shaped" narrowing of the proximal celiac artery 1, 2

  2. Mesenteric angiography: Performed in lateral projection during both inspiration and expiration to document dynamic worsening of stenosis during expiration 1, 2

  3. Duplex ultrasonography: To evaluate the influence of respiration on the stenotic degree of the celiac trunk 4

Management Options

Non-operative Management

  • Supportive treatment with analgesics
  • Dietary modifications
  • Counseling
  • Only about 33% of patients report improvement with non-operative management compared to 93% with operative management 1

Surgical Management

  • Surgical release of the median arcuate ligament: First-line treatment, providing symptomatic relief in 84.6% of patients 1, 2
  • Surgical approach options include:
    • Open decompression
    • Laparoscopic decompression
    • Robot-assisted laparoscopic decompression 5

Vascular Reconstruction

  • Indicated when residual stenosis >30% persists after ligament release 2
  • Options include:
    • Endovascular stenting (after surgical release)
    • Aorto-celiac bypass
    • Patch angioplasty
    • Resection with end-to-end anastomosis 4

Treatment Outcomes and Predictors of Success

Predictors of successful surgical outcome include:

  • Postprandial pain pattern (81% cure rate)
  • Age between 40-60 years (77% cure rate)
  • Weight loss of 20 pounds or more (67% cure rate) 1

Combined approach of surgical release with vascular reconstruction when needed provides:

  • Complete symptom resolution in 75% of patients
  • Freedom from reintervention in 64% at 6 months 1, 2

Important Considerations

  • Endovascular stenting alone without surgical release is not recommended due to persistent external compression 1, 2
  • Patients with mesenteric collateralization on angiography may be less likely to benefit from surgical release 1
  • Long-term follow-up with duplex ultrasound is necessary to monitor for persistent stenosis or aneurysmal degeneration 3

Controversies

Whether to reconstruct the celiac artery after median arcuate ligament release remains debatable:

  • One study showed persistent resolution of symptoms in 76% of patients with revascularization versus 53% with decompression alone 1
  • Another study found no significant difference in symptom relief between decompression alone versus decompression with reconstruction 1, 2

MALS remains a challenging diagnosis that requires exclusion of other causes of abdominal pain before consideration of surgical intervention.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Celiac Artery Stenosis Management

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Median Arcuate Ligament Syndrome - Literature Review and Case Report.

Revista portuguesa de cirurgia cardio-toracica e vascular : orgao oficial da Sociedade Portuguesa de Cirurgia Cardio-Toracica e Vascular, 2017

Research

Treatment of median arcuate ligament syndrome via traditional and robotic techniques.

Hawai'i journal of medicine & public health : a journal of Asia Pacific Medicine & Public Health, 2013

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.