Plasma Free Metanephrines vs. 24-Hour Urine Collection for Measuring Metanephrine Levels
Plasma free metanephrines is the preferred first-line test for measuring metanephrine levels due to its superior sensitivity (96-100%) compared to 24-hour urine collection (86-97%). 1
Diagnostic Performance Comparison
Plasma Free Metanephrines
- Sensitivity: 96-100% 1
- Specificity: 89-98% 1
- Advantages:
- Higher sensitivity for detecting pheochromocytoma 2
- No false-negative results in most studies 2
- More convenient for patients (single blood draw vs. 24-hour collection)
- Particularly valuable in high-risk patients with familial endocrine syndromes 3
- Preferred for patients who cannot reliably collect 24-hour urine 1
24-Hour Urine Fractionated Metanephrines
Clinical Decision Algorithm
For most patients: Use plasma free metanephrines as the first-line test 4, 1
For specific patient populations:
Interpretation of results:
Important Considerations
- Normal plasma metanephrine levels effectively exclude pheochromocytoma, whereas normal urine levels may still miss some cases 2
- Adrenal pheochromocytomas can sometimes be missed by urinary testing, particularly in patients with familial syndromes 3
- For screening patients with adrenal incidentalomas that display ≥10 HU on non-contrast CT or who have signs/symptoms of catecholamine excess, either plasma or 24-hour urinary metanephrines are acceptable 4
Potential Pitfalls
False positives with plasma testing can occur due to:
- Medications (tricyclic antidepressants, MAO inhibitors, sympathomimetics)
- Stress or acute illness
- Improper collection technique (not resting supine before collection)
- Failure to fast
False negatives with urine testing can occur due to:
- Incomplete 24-hour collection
- Small tumors, especially in familial syndromes
- Intermittent catecholamine secretion
For optimal results, ensure proper collection techniques and patient preparation regardless of which test is chosen.