Different Phases of Multiple Myeloma
Multiple myeloma progresses through distinct phases including monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS), smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM), and symptomatic multiple myeloma, with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma representing the final phase of disease progression.
Precursor Conditions
Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance (MGUS)
- Asymptomatic precursor condition characterized by:
- Small burden of clonal plasma cells (<10% in bone marrow)
- Low levels of monoclonal protein
- No end-organ damage
- Risk of progression to MM is approximately 1% per year 1
- Requires observation only, no active treatment
Smoldering Multiple Myeloma (SMM)
- Intermediate phase between MGUS and symptomatic MM characterized by:
- Higher burden of malignant plasma cells (≥10% but typically <60%)
- Higher levels of monoclonal proteins than MGUS
- No end-organ damage or myeloma-defining events
- Risk of progression to symptomatic myeloma is 10% per year in the first 5 years 1
- Heterogeneous condition where approximately one-third have biological malignancy 2
- High-risk SMM patients may benefit from early intervention with lenalidomide or lenalidomide plus dexamethasone 2
Active Multiple Myeloma
Newly Diagnosed Symptomatic Multiple Myeloma
- Requires ≥10% clonal bone marrow plasma cells or a biopsy-proven plasmacytoma plus evidence of one or more multiple myeloma defining events 3:
- CRAB features (hypercalcemia, renal failure, anemia, or lytic bone lesions)
- Bone marrow clonal plasmacytosis ≥60%
- Serum involved/uninvolved free light chain ratio ≥100 (provided involved FLC is ≥100 mg/L)
1 focal lesion on MRI
- Risk stratification is essential using the Revised International Staging System (R-ISS) 1:
- R-ISS I: ISS stage I (β2-microglobulin <3.5 mg/L and albumin ≥3.5 g/dL) with normal LDH and standard-risk cytogenetics
- R-ISS II: Neither stage I nor III
- R-ISS III: ISS stage III (β2-microglobulin ≥5.5 mg/L) with either high LDH or high-risk cytogenetics
Durie-Salmon Staging System
The traditional staging system based on clinical parameters 1:
| Parameter | Stage I | Stage II | Stage III |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hemoglobin | >10 g/dl | 8.5–10.0 g/dl | <8.5 g/l |
| Calcium | <3.0 mmol/l | 3.0 mmol/l | >3.0 mmol/l |
| M-protein IgA | <30 g/l | 30–50 g/l | >50 g/l |
| IgG | <50 g/l | 50–70 g/l | >70 g/l |
| Urine light chain | <4 g per 24 h | 4–12 g per 24 h | >12 g per 24 h |
| Bone X-ray | Normal bone structure | Minor bone lesions | Advanced bone lesion |
With subclassification:
- Stage A: Serum creatinine <177 μmol/l
- Stage B: Serum creatinine ≥177 μmol/l
High-Risk Multiple Myeloma
- Defined by specific cytogenetic abnormalities 3:
- del(17p)
- t(4;14)
- t(14;16)
- t(14;20)
- gain 1q
- del 1p
- p53 mutation
- Double-hit myeloma: presence of any two high-risk factors
- Triple-hit myeloma: presence of three or more high-risk factors
Advanced Disease Phases
Plateau Phase
- Period of stable disease after initial treatment response
- Characterized by stable M-protein levels
- Maintenance therapy is often administered during this phase 1
Relapsed Multiple Myeloma
- Disease progression after a period of response to previous treatment
- Typically requires change in therapy
- Response durations tend to become shorter with successive relapses 4
Refractory Multiple Myeloma
- Disease that is non-responsive to current therapy
- Defined as disease progression during therapy or within 60 days of last treatment 4
- Median survival ranges from 6-9 months in patients with relapsed/refractory disease 4
Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma
- Disease that has become resistant to multiple lines of therapy
- Characterized by more aggressive tumor phenotype, higher proliferative fraction, and lower apoptotic rates 4
- Often requires novel therapeutic approaches or clinical trials
Clinical Considerations
- Risk assessment should be performed at diagnosis and repeated at relapse 1
- Bone marrow examination with FISH for myeloma abnormalities is essential at relapse to detect new high-risk abnormalities such as 17p deletion and 1q amplification 1
- Treatment approaches differ based on:
- Transplant eligibility
- Risk stratification
- Previous therapies and response
- Disease biology at relapse
Understanding these distinct phases of multiple myeloma is crucial for appropriate risk stratification, treatment selection, and prognostication of patients with this heterogeneous disease.