Role of Sacubitril/Valsartan in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Sacubitril/valsartan is not recommended for the management of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) as it has shown no significant benefit in exercise capacity, cardiac structure, or function in patients with non-obstructive HCM. 1
Current Pharmacological Management of HCM
First-Line Therapy
Beta-blockers are the first-line pharmacological therapy for symptomatic obstructive HCM
- Should be titrated to a resting heart rate of <60-65 bpm or maximally tolerated dose 2
- Aim to reduce early LV ejection acceleration and systolic pushing force on mitral leaflet
- Most effective for managing symptoms such as dyspnea and angina
Calcium channel blockers (verapamil or diltiazem) are reasonable alternatives when:
- Beta-blockers are ineffective
- Patient has side effects or contraindications to beta-blockers 2
- Should be used with caution in patients with high gradients, advanced heart failure, or sinus bradycardia
Advanced Therapy Options for Persistent Symptoms
For patients who don't respond to first-line therapy, options include:
Cardiac myosin inhibitors (mavacamten) - for adult patients only
- Shown to improve LVOT gradients, symptoms, and functional capacity in 30-60% of patients with obstructive HCM 2
- Requires risk evaluation and mitigation strategy due to potential decrease in LVEF
Disopyramide - in combination with beta-blockers or calcium channel blockers
- Should not be used alone in patients with AF 2
Septal reduction therapy - when performed by experienced operators
Evidence Against Sacubitril/Valsartan in HCM
The SILICOFCM trial (2024) specifically evaluated sacubitril/valsartan in non-obstructive HCM and found:
- No significant change in peak oxygen consumption (primary endpoint)
- No clinically significant changes in blood pressure, cardiac structure and function, plasma biomarkers, or quality of life
- While well-tolerated, it demonstrated no therapeutic benefit 1
Potential Role of Valsartan Alone
While sacubitril/valsartan is not recommended, valsartan alone may have a limited role:
- For younger patients (≤45 years) with non-obstructive HCM due to pathogenic cardiac sarcomere genetic variant and mild phenotype 3
- The VANISH trial showed valsartan may attenuate disease evolution in early-stage sarcomeric HCM 4
- Valsartan has been shown to reduce type I collagen synthesis in HCM patients, potentially improving myocardial fibrosis 5
- Recent CMR substudy of VANISH demonstrated valsartan reduced intracellular volume progression and improved biventricular remodeling 6
Cautions and Contraindications
- Vasodilators (including ARBs) should be used with caution in obstructive HCM as they can potentially worsen LVOT gradient 2
- The 2011 ACC/AHA guidelines specifically note that ARBs are "potentially harmful for treatment of symptoms in patients with HCM who have resting or provocable LVOT obstruction" 2
Clinical Algorithm for HCM Management
First determine if obstructive or non-obstructive HCM
- If obstructive: Start with beta-blockers
- If non-obstructive: Beta-blockers or calcium channel blockers based on comorbidities
If symptoms persist despite first-line therapy:
- For obstructive HCM: Consider cardiac myosin inhibitor, disopyramide, or septal reduction
- For non-obstructive HCM: Consider adding low-dose diuretics
Special case - early sarcomeric HCM in younger patients:
- Consider valsartan to potentially slow disease progression
- Not recommended for established disease
Avoid in all HCM patients:
- Dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers
- Positive inotropic agents
- Sacubitril/valsartan (no proven benefit)
The evidence clearly shows that while valsartan alone may have a role in early disease modification for specific HCM subgroups, sacubitril/valsartan combination therapy has not demonstrated benefits in HCM management.