Non-Adherent Dressings for Wound Management
For wounds requiring a dressing that will not stick to the wound bed, use a non-adherent dressing such as silicone-based dressings (like Mepitel), paraffin gauze, or hydrocolloid dressings based on wound characteristics and exudate level.
Types of Non-Adherent Dressings
Primary Options (Best Evidence)
Silicone-based dressings:
Paraffin-impregnated gauze:
Hydrocolloid dressings:
Selection Based on Wound Type
For Dry or Necrotic Wounds:
- Continuously moistened saline gauze or hydrogels 4
- Helps maintain moisture and promote autolytic debridement
For Exudative Wounds:
- Alginates or foam dressings 4
- Silicone foam dressings can effectively manage exudate and reduce pooling 5
For Wounds Requiring Autolysis:
- Hydrocolloids 4
- Creates moist environment for natural debridement
Application Principles
Cleanse wound appropriately:
Apply appropriate interface layer:
- Place non-adherent dressing directly on wound bed 3
- Ensure dressing extends beyond wound margins
Add secondary dressing if needed:
Secure dressing appropriately:
- Use minimal tape or wrap to secure
- Avoid excessive pressure that could cause tissue damage
Special Considerations
For Severe Wounds (e.g., Stevens-Johnson Syndrome/TEN)
- Apply non-adherent dressings to denuded dermis 3
- Consider leaving detached epidermis in situ to act as biological dressing 3
- Decompress blisters by piercing and expression or aspiration of fluid 3
For Diabetic Foot Ulcers
- Select dressings primarily based on exudate control, comfort, and cost 3
- Do not use dressings containing antimicrobial agents solely to accelerate healing 3
- Consider sucrose-octasulfate-impregnated dressings for non-infected, neuro-ischemic diabetic foot ulcers that are difficult to heal 3, 4
Dressing Change Protocol
Timing:
Removal technique:
- Gently remove secondary dressing
- Leave primary non-adherent layer in place if not soiled or saturated
- If removal needed, consider soaking with saline if adherence has occurred
Assessment during changes:
- Monitor for signs of infection (redness, swelling, foul-smelling drainage, increased pain, fever) 3
- Evaluate wound healing progress
Comparative Effectiveness
Research comparing non-adherent dressings found:
- Cellulose acetate fiber dressings (Adaptic) were significantly easier to remove, less painful, and caused less maceration than paraffin gauze (Jelonet) 6
- Silicone-based dressings (Mepitel) were also easier to remove than paraffin gauze 6
- Silicone technology prevents trauma and minimizes wound pain while facilitating undisturbed healing 2, 1
Cautions and Pitfalls
- Ensure dressing selection matches wound exudate level to prevent maceration or drying
- Do not use antimicrobial-containing dressings solely to accelerate healing 3
- Be aware that dressing adherence can still occur if:
- Dressing is left in place too long
- Wound has dried out
- Exudate has caused dressing to adhere
- For surgical wounds, avoid advanced dressings over standard dressings as they do not significantly reduce infection rates 3
By selecting the appropriate non-adherent dressing based on wound characteristics and following proper application techniques, you can minimize trauma during dressing changes and optimize wound healing conditions.