What antibiotic is recommended for spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) prophylaxis?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 15, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Norfloxacin is the First-Line Antibiotic for SBP Prophylaxis

Norfloxacin 400 mg daily is the recommended first-line antibiotic for spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) prophylaxis in cirrhotic patients with ascites, based on extensive evidence demonstrating its efficacy in reducing SBP recurrence and improving survival. 1, 2

Indications for SBP Prophylaxis

SBP prophylaxis should be initiated in the following patient populations:

  1. Secondary prophylaxis (patients with prior SBP):

    • All patients who survive an episode of SBP should receive indefinite antibiotic prophylaxis until liver transplantation or resolution of ascites
    • Without prophylaxis, recurrence rate is approximately 70% at 1 year 1, 2
    • Norfloxacin reduces SBP recurrence from 68% to 20% 1
  2. Primary prophylaxis (patients without prior SBP):

    • Patients with low ascitic fluid protein (<1.5 g/dL) AND advanced liver disease (Child-Pugh score ≥9 with serum bilirubin >3 mg/dL, impaired renal function, or serum sodium <130 mEq/L) 1, 2
    • Patients with cirrhosis and acute gastrointestinal bleeding (short-term prophylaxis) 2

Antibiotic Options for SBP Prophylaxis

First-Line Option:

  • Norfloxacin 400 mg once daily 1, 2
    • Most extensively studied and recommended by European Association for the Study of the Liver
    • Significantly reduces SBP recurrence and improves short-term survival

Alternative Options:

  1. Ciprofloxacin 500 mg once daily 2, 3, 4

    • Similar efficacy to norfloxacin
    • Weekly ciprofloxacin has been shown to be non-inferior to daily norfloxacin in some studies 3
  2. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole 800/160 mg daily 2, 4, 5

    • Similar efficacy to norfloxacin
    • Higher risk of adverse events (rash, hyperkalemia, bone marrow suppression)
    • Consider in patients with quinolone allergy or resistance
  3. Rifaximin 550 mg twice daily 2, 6

    • Emerging evidence suggests superior efficacy for secondary prophylaxis
    • Recent randomized controlled trial showed significantly lower SBP recurrence with rifaximin compared to norfloxacin (7% vs 39%, p=0.004) 6
    • Additional benefit of reducing hepatic encephalopathy episodes
  4. For patients with gastrointestinal bleeding:

    • IV ceftriaxone for 7 days (preferred in advanced liver disease)
    • Norfloxacin 400 mg twice daily for 7 days 2

Management Considerations

Duration of Prophylaxis:

  • Secondary prophylaxis: Continue indefinitely until liver transplantation or resolution of ascites
  • Primary prophylaxis: Continue until risk factors resolve or transplantation

Monitoring:

  • Regular assessment of renal function every 1-3 months
  • Periodic cultures to detect resistant organisms
  • Monitor for adverse effects of antibiotics

Potential Complications:

  • Long-term quinolone use has led to increasing gram-positive and multi-drug resistant infections 1, 2
  • Consider alternative antibiotics if infection develops with resistant bacteria
  • Fluoroquinolones can cause rare but serious musculoskeletal and nervous system side effects

Special Considerations

  1. Quinolone resistance:

    • If infection develops with quinolone-resistant bacteria, consider switching to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole or rifaximin 2
    • Rifaximin may be particularly valuable in areas with high quinolone resistance 6
  2. Hepatic encephalopathy:

    • Consider rifaximin for patients with both SBP risk and hepatic encephalopathy 6
  3. Renal dysfunction:

    • For patients with active SBP, adding albumin to antibiotic therapy decreases hepatorenal syndrome risk and improves survival 7

Despite clear guidelines, SBP prophylaxis remains underutilized, with only one-third of eligible patients receiving appropriate prophylaxis after discharge 2. The evidence strongly supports prophylaxis for high-risk patients, with benefits in mortality reduction outweighing the risks of long-term antibiotic use.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Management of Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis (SBP)

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis.

Current treatment options in gastroenterology, 2002

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.