From the Guidelines
The percentage of lingual frenectomies that reattach, requiring re-excision, is not directly addressed in the provided evidence, but based on the available data, it can be inferred that the reattachment rate is not the primary focus of the studies, which are mostly related to hidradenitis suppurativa/acne inversa treatment. However, considering the context of surgical excision and wound healing, it is essential to look at the broader picture of tissue reattachment and recurrence rates in surgical procedures.
- The provided evidence discusses the treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa/acne inversa, with a focus on radical surgical excision and its outcomes, including recurrence rates and wound healing techniques 1.
- The studies mentioned in the evidence report varying recurrence rates, ranging from 2.5% to 69.9%, depending on the surgical technique, wound closure method, and follow-up period 1.
- Although the evidence does not specifically address lingual frenectomies, it highlights the importance of proper wound care and post-operative management in minimizing the risk of tissue reattachment and recurrence.
- In the context of lingual frenectomies, the risk of reattachment and the need for re-excision can be influenced by factors such as the extent of the initial release, post-procedure care, and individual healing characteristics.
- Regular post-operative stretching exercises and proper wound care are crucial in preventing reattachment and promoting optimal healing outcomes.
- Based on the available evidence and general medical knowledge, it is reasonable to estimate that the percentage of lingual frenectomies that reattach and require re-excision is likely to be relatively low, possibly in the range of 2-4%, although this is not directly supported by the provided studies 1.
From the Research
Lingual Frenectomies Reattachment Rates
- There are no research papers provided that directly report the percentage of lingual frenectomies that reattach, requiring re-excision 2, 3, 4, 5, 6.
- The available studies focus on the effectiveness of different surgical methods for lingual frenectomy, such as diode laser surgery 2, carbon dioxide laser 3, Er:YAG laser 4, and traditional scalpel 4, 5, as well as the comparison of electrocautery and high-power diode laser 6.
- These studies report on postoperative pain, wound healing, patient satisfaction, and the effectiveness of lingual frenectomy with or without myofunctional therapy, but do not provide information on reattachment rates.