What is the recommended treatment protocol for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) using the CALGB 9111 (Cancer and Leukemia Group B 9111) protocol?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 16, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

CALGB 9111 Protocol for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

The CALGB 9111 protocol is a high-intensity regimen for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) that includes a 5-drug induction regimen (vincristine, daunorubicin, prednisone, L-asparaginase, and cyclophosphamide) with the addition of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) to reduce neutropenia-related complications. 1

Protocol Components and Structure

Induction Phase

  • Based on the CALGB 8811 regimen with the addition of G-CSF
  • 5-drug combination:
    • Vincristine
    • Daunorubicin
    • Prednisone
    • L-asparaginase
    • Cyclophosphamide
  • G-CSF administration during neutropenic periods 1

Key Benefits of G-CSF Addition

  • Significantly shorter duration of severe neutropenia (p<0.001)
  • Reduced thrombocytopenia duration (p=0.003)
  • Earlier hospital discharge (p=0.02)
  • Lower induction mortality, particularly in older patients (10% vs 25% without G-CSF) 1

Patient Selection and Considerations

Appropriate Candidates

  • Adults with newly diagnosed ALL
  • Primarily recommended for patients <65 years with good performance status and minimal comorbidities 1
  • May be considered for fit older adults, though with dose modifications

Risk Stratification

  • For patients with Ph-negative ALL, high-risk features include:
    • Elevated WBC count (≥30 × 10^9/L for B-cell lineage; ≥100 × 10^9/L for T-cell lineage)
    • Hypodiploidy
    • MLL rearrangements 1

Efficacy and Outcomes

The CALGB 9111 study demonstrated:

  • Improved complete remission rates with G-CSF (81% vs 55% in older patients)
  • Median overall survival of 12 months in elderly patients
  • 3-year overall survival of 17% in elderly patients 1

Toxicity Management

Common Toxicities

  • Myelosuppression
  • Infection risk during neutropenic periods
  • L-asparaginase-related hepatotoxicity
  • Steroid-related complications

Supportive Care

  • G-CSF administration is critical to reduce neutropenia-related complications
  • Appropriate antimicrobial prophylaxis
  • Close monitoring of hepatic function
  • CNS prophylaxis is incorporated into the regimen 2

Modern Context and Alternatives

The NCCN Guidelines (2024) classify CALGB 9111 as a high-intensity regimen option for:

  • Patients <65 years with Ph-negative ALL
  • Select fit patients ≥65 years with Ph-negative ALL 1

Alternative regimens by intensity level:

  • High-intensity: ECOG 1910, dose-adjusted hyper-CVAD
  • Moderate-intensity: ALLOLD07, EWALL, GMALL, GRAALL, modified DFCI 91-01
  • Low-intensity: Vincristine and prednisone, POMP 1, 2

Post-Induction Management

After induction with CALGB 9111:

  • MRD assessment is critical for determining subsequent therapy
  • If MRD positive: Consider blinatumomab (preferred) or inotuzumab ozogamicin
  • Consolidation with allogeneic HCT should be considered for high-risk patients
  • Maintenance therapy typically follows consolidation 1, 2

Important Considerations

  • Treatment should be administered in specialized centers with experience in managing ALL
  • Adequate supportive care is essential to minimize toxicities
  • CNS prophylaxis is a critical component of ALL treatment
  • MRD assessment guides post-induction therapy decisions 2

Pitfalls and Caveats

  • Higher treatment-related mortality compared to less intensive regimens
  • May not be appropriate for older or less fit patients
  • Requires careful monitoring and aggressive supportive care
  • Consider dose modifications for patients ≥60 years (as in the original protocol with 33% reduction of daunorubicin and cyclophosphamide doses) 1
  • More recent treatment approaches may offer better outcomes with less toxicity for certain patient populations 1, 2

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia Treatment

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.