What is the next step in managing a patient with moderate mitral valve regurgitation, moderate aortic valve regurgitation, and normal left ventricular systolic function?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 16, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Management of Moderate Mitral and Aortic Valve Regurgitation with Normal Left Ventricular Function

For a patient with moderate mitral valve regurgitation, moderate aortic valve regurgitation, and normal left ventricular systolic function, the next step should be regular clinical follow-up every 6 months with echocardiography performed annually.

Clinical Assessment and Risk Stratification

The patient presents with:

  • Normal left ventricular systolic function (EF 55%)
  • Grade I diastolic dysfunction
  • Normal right ventricular function
  • Holosystolic prolapse of the posterior mitral valve
  • Moderate mitral valve regurgitation
  • Moderate aortic valve regurgitation
  • Mild tricuspid valve regurgitation

Risk Assessment

This patient has multiple valve lesions (mixed valve disease) but with preserved left ventricular function. The presence of multiple moderate valve lesions may accelerate disease progression compared to single valve disease 1.

Management Recommendations

Follow-up Schedule

  • Clinical evaluation every 6 months 1, 2
  • Echocardiography annually 1, 2
  • Patient should be instructed to promptly report any change in functional status 1

Parameters to Monitor

  1. Left ventricular function and dimensions:

    • Track any decrease in LVEF below 55%
    • Monitor for LV dilation
    • Assess for changes in diastolic function
  2. Valve regurgitation progression:

    • Progression from moderate to severe regurgitation
    • Changes in regurgitant volume or effective regurgitant orifice area
  3. Development of symptoms:

    • Dyspnea on exertion
    • Decreased exercise tolerance
    • Fatigue
    • Palpitations
  4. Pulmonary pressures:

    • Development of pulmonary hypertension (systolic pulmonary pressure >50 mmHg)

Exercise Testing Considerations

  • Consider exercise echocardiography if there is discrepancy between symptoms and resting echocardiographic findings 1
  • Exercise testing can reveal:
    • Dynamic changes in regurgitation severity
    • Exercise-induced pulmonary hypertension
    • Left ventricular contractile reserve

Indications for Intervention

Surgical intervention should be considered if any of the following develop:

  1. Symptoms attributable to valve disease
  2. Left ventricular ejection fraction decreases below 60%
  3. Left ventricular end-systolic dimension increases ≥40 mm
  4. Development of pulmonary hypertension (systolic pulmonary pressure >50 mmHg)
  5. New onset atrial fibrillation 1

Medical Therapy

Currently, there is no indication for vasodilator therapy (including ACE inhibitors) in chronic mitral or aortic regurgitation with normal left ventricular function and no heart failure symptoms 1.

If heart failure symptoms develop:

  • ACE inhibitors should be considered
  • Beta-blockers may be appropriate
  • Diuretics for symptom management

Pitfalls and Caveats

  1. Underestimation of regurgitation severity: Eccentric jets of mitral regurgitation may be underestimated by color flow imaging alone 1. Comprehensive assessment using multiple parameters is essential.

  2. Mixed valve disease complexity: The coexistence of both mitral and aortic regurgitation may lead to more rapid progression than either lesion alone 1. More frequent monitoring may be needed if there are signs of progression.

  3. Delayed intervention risks: Waiting too long for intervention in progressive valve disease can lead to irreversible myocardial damage 2.

  4. Mitral valve prolapse dynamics: Patients with mitral valve prolapse may have dynamic changes in regurgitation severity that aren't captured on resting echocardiography 1.

  5. Diastolic dysfunction progression: Grade I diastolic dysfunction can progress to higher grades and eventually heart failure with preserved ejection fraction 2.

By following these recommendations, the patient's condition can be appropriately monitored to determine the optimal timing for intervention if the valve disease progresses or symptoms develop.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Echocardiography Guidelines

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.