Does a patient with significant radiculopathy and an MRI showing a broad-based disc protrusion at L4-L5 with bilateral neural foraminal encroachment require a surgical referral?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 16, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Surgical Referral for L4-L5 Disc Protrusion with Bilateral Neural Foraminal Encroachment and Significant Radiculopathy

Surgery should only be considered after 6 weeks of failed conservative management for a patient with L4-L5 disc protrusion with bilateral neural foraminal encroachment and significant radiculopathy. 1

Initial Management Approach

Conservative management should be the first-line approach for 6 weeks, including:

  • Pain medications (NSAIDs, Acetaminophen)
  • Physical therapy with postural education, gentle stretching, and core strengthening
  • Activity modification and heat/cold therapy 1

For persistent neuropathic pain:

  • Consider gabapentin for neuropathic pain management
  • Duloxetine as a second-line therapy for chronic pain 1

Indications for Surgical Referral

A surgical referral is warranted when:

  1. Pain control remains unsuccessful after 6 weeks of adequate conservative management
  2. Motor deficit greater than grade 3 is present
  3. Radicular pain persists and is clearly associated with the foraminal stenosis seen on imaging
  4. Cauda equina syndrome develops (urgent referral required) 1

Imaging Considerations

The MRI findings of broad-based disc protrusion at L4-L5 with bilateral neural foraminal encroachment correlate with the clinical presentation of significant radiculopathy. This is important because:

  • L4-L5 is one of the most commonly affected disc levels in lumbar radiculopathy 2
  • Bilateral neural foraminal encroachment can cause bilateral radiculopathy, which may be overlooked in clinical practice 3
  • MRI without contrast is typically sufficient for evaluating disc herniation and neural compression 1

Treatment Outcomes and Prognosis

It's important to note that:

  • Up to 75% of patients with acute radiculopathy may experience spontaneous improvement 1
  • Studies have shown that some disc herniations can resolve or improve with conservative management alone 4
  • By 12 months, outcomes between surgical and non-surgical management often become similar 1

Surgical Options if Referral is Made

If surgical referral becomes necessary:

  • For routine disc herniations, lumbar discectomy without fusion is typically the procedure of choice
  • Fusion should only be considered when the herniation is associated with spinal instability, chronic low back pain, or severe degenerative changes 1
  • For bilateral radiculopathy with foraminal stenosis, bilateral lateral fenestration or posterior lumbar interbody fusion may be appropriate 3

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  1. Premature surgical referral: Avoid referring for surgery before an adequate trial of conservative management (6 weeks) unless red flags are present
  2. Overlooking bilateral pathology: Bilateral foraminal stenosis at L4-L5 can be overlooked as a cause of bilateral symptoms 3
  3. Inadequate correlation of imaging with symptoms: Ensure the radiographic findings match the clinical presentation before proceeding with invasive treatments 1
  4. Neglecting to monitor for neurological deterioration: Regular follow-up every 4-6 weeks is recommended to assess for any worsening that might necessitate earlier surgical intervention 1

Remember that while the imaging shows bilateral neural foraminal encroachment, this finding must be correlated with the specific pattern and severity of the patient's radiculopathy when determining the need for surgical referral.

References

Guideline

Radiculopathy Management

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

MRI evaluation of lumbar disc degenerative disease.

Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR, 2015

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.