What is the recommended approach for documenting a diabetic foot exam on a 14-year-old male?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 16, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Documentation of Diabetic Foot Examination in a 14-Year-Old Male

For a 14-year-old male with diabetes, the diabetic foot examination should be documented using a comprehensive approach that includes inspection, assessment of foot pulses, and testing for loss of protective sensation with the 10-g monofilament and at least one additional neurological test. 1

When to Begin Foot Examinations

  • For adolescents with Type 1 diabetes: Begin at puberty or ≥10 years old (whichever comes first) and after 5 years of diabetes duration 1
  • For adolescents with Type 2 diabetes: Begin at diagnosis 1
  • Follow-up frequency: Annually if normal; more frequently if abnormalities are detected 1

Essential Components to Document

1. General Inspection

  • Document skin integrity (presence of calluses, fissures, breaks, or ulcerations)
  • Note any foot deformities (bunions, hammertoes, prominent metatarsal heads)
  • Check between toes for maceration or fungal infection 2

2. Neurological Assessment

  • 10-g Semmes-Weinstein monofilament testing:
    • Document testing at three specific sites on each foot (as shown in guidelines)
    • Record whether patient correctly identifies 2 out of 3 applications at each site 1
  • Additional neurological test (at least one must be performed and documented):
    • Vibration sensation using 128-Hz tuning fork (applied to bony prominence of distal phalanx of first toe)
    • Pinprick sensation test
    • Ankle reflex assessment 1

3. Vascular Assessment

  • Document palpation of dorsalis pedis and posterior tibial pulses (present/diminished/absent)
  • Note capillary refill time
  • Record any abnormal findings suggesting vascular compromise 2

4. Risk Stratification

  • Document the patient's risk category based on findings:
    • Very Low: No loss of protective sensation (LOPS) and no peripheral arterial disease (PAD)
    • Low: LOPS or PAD
    • Moderate: LOPS + PAD, or LOPS + foot deformity, or PAD + foot deformity
    • High: LOPS or PAD with history of foot ulcer or amputation 2

Documentation Template Example

DIABETIC FOOT EXAMINATION:

History: [Document any previous foot problems, symptoms of neuropathy or vascular disease]

Inspection:
- Skin integrity: [intact/abnormal - describe]
- Deformities: [none/present - describe]
- Interdigital spaces: [normal/macerated/fungal infection]

Neurological Assessment:
- 10-g monofilament testing:
  * Right foot: [sites tested and results]
  * Left foot: [sites tested and results]
- Vibration sensation (128-Hz tuning fork):
  * Right foot: [normal/diminished/absent]
  * Left foot: [normal/diminished/absent]

Vascular Assessment:
- Dorsalis pedis pulse: Right [present/diminished/absent], Left [present/diminished/absent]
- Posterior tibial pulse: Right [present/diminished/absent], Left [present/diminished/absent]
- Capillary refill: [normal/delayed]

Risk Assessment: [Very Low/Low/Moderate/High]

Plan:
- Education provided: [specify]
- Follow-up recommended: [specify timeframe]
- Referrals: [if needed]

Important Considerations for Pediatric Patients

  • Documentation should acknowledge developmental considerations appropriate for a 14-year-old
  • Include assessment of footwear appropriateness for adolescent activities
  • Document education provided to both the patient and parents/caregivers 2
  • Note any barriers to foot care compliance specific to adolescents

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  1. Skipping the foot exam because the patient is young - guidelines clearly indicate foot exams should begin at puberty or age 10 in type 1 diabetes and at diagnosis in type 2 diabetes 1

  2. Incomplete neurological testing - ensure both monofilament testing AND at least one additional neurological test are performed and documented 1

  3. Failure to document patient education - adolescents need age-appropriate education on foot care practices 2

  4. Overlooking footwear assessment - document whether current footwear is appropriate for the patient's foot status and activity level

  5. Not specifying follow-up frequency - clearly document when the next foot examination should occur based on risk stratification 2

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Diabetic Foot Care Guidelines

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.