Is a temporal CT (computed tomography) scan with contrast useful for diagnosing pulsatile tinnitus?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 16, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Temporal CT with Contrast for Pulsatile Tinnitus

CT angiography (CTA) of the head and neck with IV contrast is the recommended first-line imaging modality for evaluating pulsatile tinnitus, rather than a temporal CT with contrast alone. 1, 2

Optimal Imaging Approach for Pulsatile Tinnitus

First-Line Imaging Options

  • CT angiography (CTA) of head and neck with IV contrast:

    • Provides excellent visualization of both arterial and venous pathologies
    • Can detect dural arteriovenous fistulas (dAVFs) with 90% sensitivity and specificity
    • Allows evaluation of both vascular structures and bony temporal bone anatomy
    • Enables detection of vascular variants, arteriovenous malformations, and dissections 1, 2
  • Non-contrast temporal bone CT:

    • Appropriate when a vascular retrotympanic mass is visible on otoscopy
    • Excellent for identifying bony abnormalities such as:
      • Superior semicircular canal dehiscence
      • Sigmoid sinus wall abnormalities
      • High-riding jugular bulb
      • Otospongiosis
      • Paget disease 1

Why Temporal CT with Contrast Alone is Not Recommended

  • No supporting literature: The 2023 ACR Appropriateness Criteria explicitly states "there is no relevant literature to support the use of CT temporal bone with IV contrast for evaluation of PT when otoscopy does not show a vascular retrotympanic lesion" 1
  • Limited field of view: Cannot adequately assess neck vessels 1
  • Unnecessary contrast: IV contrast is not needed for evaluating many temporal bone abnormalities that cause pulsatile tinnitus 1

Clinical Decision Algorithm

  1. If otoscopy reveals a vascular retrotympanic mass:

    • Begin with non-contrast temporal bone CT 1
  2. If otoscopy is normal:

    • Proceed with CTA head and neck with IV contrast 1, 2
    • Alternative: MRI/MRA if radiation or contrast concerns exist 1, 2
  3. If initial imaging is inconclusive but clinical suspicion remains high:

    • Consider conventional angiography (DSA), especially if dAVF is suspected 1, 2, 3

Common Vascular Causes of Pulsatile Tinnitus

  • Arteriovenous fistulas and malformations
  • Vascular tumors (paragangliomas, glomus tumors)
  • Sigmoid sinus wall abnormalities
  • Carotid artery stenosis or dissection
  • Intracranial hypertension
  • Venous anomalies 2, 4

Important Considerations

  • Pulsatile tinnitus requires both a functional hearing organ and a physical source of sound 4
  • In one study, highly vascularized tumors (16%), venous variants/anomalies (14%), and vascular stenoses (9%) were the most common causes of pulsatile tinnitus 4
  • Combined CT angiography and venography is particularly useful in otoscopically normal patients 5
  • Avoid the pitfall of ordering temporal CT with contrast, as this provides incomplete evaluation and may lead to missed diagnoses 1

By following this evidence-based approach, clinicians can efficiently diagnose the underlying cause of pulsatile tinnitus and guide appropriate treatment to improve patient outcomes.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Diagnostic Approach to Pulsatile Tinnitus

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Pulsatile tinnitus: imaging and differential diagnosis.

Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2013

Research

Imaging in pulsatile tinnitus.

Clinical radiology, 2009

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.