What imaging is recommended for intermittent pulsatile tinnitus?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 16, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Imaging Recommendations for Intermittent Pulsatile Tinnitus

CT angiography (CTA) of the head and neck with IV contrast is the recommended first-line imaging modality for evaluating pulsatile tinnitus, as it provides excellent visualization of both vascular structures and temporal bone anatomy. 1

Diagnostic Algorithm

Initial Evaluation

  • If otoscopy reveals a vascular retrotympanic mass:
    • Begin with non-contrast temporal bone CT 1
  • If otoscopy is normal:
    • Proceed with CTA head and neck with IV contrast 1

Alternative First-Line Options

  • MRI with MR angiography (MRA) if:
    • Patient has contraindications to radiation exposure
    • Patient has contraindications to iodinated contrast
    • Pregnancy is present 1

Second-Line Imaging

  • Conventional angiography (DSA) if:
    • Initial imaging is inconclusive but clinical suspicion remains high
    • Objective pulsatile tinnitus is present with inconclusive noninvasive imaging
    • Further characterization of dural arteriovenous fistula (dAVF) is needed 2, 1

Advantages of CTA for Pulsatile Tinnitus

  • Detects vascular abnormalities with high sensitivity and specificity (90% for dAVFs) 1
  • Allows evaluation of:
    • Arterial variants and pathologies (dissections, stenosis)
    • Venous abnormalities (sigmoid sinus wall anomalies, jugular bulb variants)
    • Dural arteriovenous fistulas
    • Bony abnormalities (superior semicircular canal dehiscence) 2, 1
  • Dedicated temporal bone CT reconstructions can be created from CTA source images without additional radiation exposure 2

MRI/MRA Considerations

  • Comparable accuracy to catheter angiography in small studies 2, 3
  • Better characterizes the relationship between nerves and blood vessels 2
  • Superior for evaluating:
    • Cisternal lesions
    • Auditory pathway masses
    • Intracranial vascular malformations 2
  • In one study, MRI/MRA defined anatomical abnormalities that may contribute to pulsatile tinnitus in 63% of patients 4

Ultrasound Applications

  • Carotid duplex/Doppler ultrasound is helpful for:
    • Evaluating extracranial carotid stenosis
    • Detecting elevated resistive indices suggesting intracranial vascular abnormalities 2, 1

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Failing to perform a thorough otoscopic examination before imaging
  • Not considering both arterial and venous causes of pulsatile tinnitus
  • Overlooking non-vascular causes (e.g., paragangliomas, otosclerosis)
  • Ordering unnecessary imaging for non-concerning tinnitus presentations 1
  • Relying solely on CT or MRI without angiographic components, as many vascular lesions are seen best (46%) or only (36%) on angiographic studies 3

Important Clinical Considerations

  • Pulsatile tinnitus requires both a functional hearing organ and a physical source of sound 5
  • Common causes include:
    • Vascular abnormalities (arteriovenous malformations/fistulas, venous diverticulum)
    • Highly vascularized temporal bone tumors (16% in one series)
    • Venous normal variants and anomalies (14%)
    • Vascular stenoses (9%)
    • Dural arteriovenous fistulae (8%)
    • Intracranial hypertension (8%) 1, 5

When evaluating intermittent pulsatile tinnitus, a systematic imaging approach using CTA as the first-line modality, with appropriate alternatives based on patient-specific factors, provides the most comprehensive evaluation for identifying the underlying cause.

References

Guideline

Diagnostic Imaging for Pulsatile Tinnitus

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

MR imaging and MR angiography in the evaluation of pulsatile tinnitus.

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 1994

Research

Pulsatile tinnitus: imaging and differential diagnosis.

Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2013

Related Questions

Is a temporal CT (computed tomography) scan with contrast useful for diagnosing pulsatile tinnitus?
Is it okay that my healthcare provider ordered an Magnetic Resonance Venography (MRV) instead of a Magnetic Resonance Angiography (MRA) to investigate my symptoms of pulsatile tinnitus, balance problems, and pressure in the face and head, given my previous clear Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), Computed Tomography (CT), and Computed Tomography Venography (CTV) scans?
What is the evaluation and management approach for patients presenting with pulsatile tinnitus?
What is the differential diagnosis for a patient presenting with pulsatile tinnitus, characterized by a whooshing sound in the ear, considering potential underlying vascular and other serious conditions?
What are the possible causes of unilateral pulsatile tinnitus in the right ear, particularly in a patient with potential idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH)-like symptoms without papilledema, and a clean magnetic resonance venography (MRV) result?
What is the recommended treatment for Haemophilus influenzae (H. influenzae) beta-lactamase positive infections?
Is a temporal CT (computed tomography) scan with contrast useful for diagnosing pulsatile tinnitus?
What are the recommended treatments for common sleep disorders like insomnia, sleep apnea, and restless leg syndrome?
What is the management for a grade 5 splenic (spleen) laceration?
What adjustments should be made to the testosterone regimen of a 42-year-old male with hypogonadism, elevated hemoglobin, and hematocrit levels?
What is the treatment for a jellyfish sting?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.