What is the sensitivity of D-dimer (D-dimer test) for diagnosing aortic dissection?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 17, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Sensitivity of D-dimer for Aortic Dissection

D-dimer has a high sensitivity of 94-98% for acute aortic dissection at the standard threshold of 0.5 μg/mL, making it a valuable initial screening test, though it cannot be used as the sole diagnostic tool due to important limitations. 1, 2, 3

Sensitivity Values and Clinical Utility

  • The American College of Emergency Physicians clinical policy reports sensitivity values for D-dimer in acute aortic dissection:

    • At >0.5 μg/mL threshold: 98% sensitivity 2
    • Negative predictive value: 96-100% 2
  • A pooled meta-analysis of 11 studies with 349 patients found:

    • Overall sensitivity: 94% (95% CI 91-96%) 3
    • Sensitivity remained consistent (95%) in sensitivity analyses 3

Limitations and False Negatives

Several important clinical scenarios can lead to false-negative D-dimer results in aortic dissection:

  1. Time-dependent factors:

    • Significant negative correlation between D-dimer values and time from symptom onset 1
    • Testing is most reliable when performed shortly after symptom onset 2
    • D-dimer has a half-life of approximately 16 hours 2
  2. Anatomical factors:

    • Thrombosed false lumens result in lower D-dimer levels 1
    • Intramural hematomas without intimal flap may produce false negatives 1
    • Short dissection length correlates with lower D-dimer values 1, 4
    • Lower extension score independently associated with negative D-dimer results 4
  3. Patient factors:

    • Younger patients more likely to have false-negative results 1
    • Higher platelet count independently associated with negative D-dimer results 4

Clinical Implications

  • Despite high sensitivity, D-dimer should not be used as the sole screening tool for aortic dissection 5
  • A negative D-dimer result alone cannot exclude patients with potentially fatal aortic dissection conditions 4
  • Even patients with negative D-dimer may require emergency surgery (44% of negative D-dimer patients had type A dissection and 33% required emergency operation due to cardiac tamponade) 4

Optimal Use in Clinical Practice

  • D-dimer is most useful when combined with clinical risk stratification
  • The Aortic Dissection Detection Risk Score (ADD-RS) combined with negative D-dimer has reported sensitivity of 99.9-100% 6
  • CTA remains the recommended imaging modality for suspected aortic dissection with sensitivity of 99% (95% CI 91-100%) and specificity of 100% (95% CI 99-100%) 1

Important Caveats

  • D-dimer lacks specificity for aortic dissection (ranges from 40-100%) 3
  • Elevated in many other conditions including pulmonary embolism, myocardial infarction, pregnancy, advanced age, recent surgery, inflammatory conditions, cancer, and infections 2
  • Different D-dimer assays may produce different results, and cutoff values are not transferable between methods or institutions 2

In summary, while D-dimer has high sensitivity for acute aortic dissection, clinicians must recognize its limitations and not rely solely on a negative result to exclude this potentially fatal diagnosis, particularly in patients with high clinical suspicion.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

D-Dimer Levels and Venous Thromboembolism

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.