Sensitivity of D-dimer for Aortic Dissection
D-dimer has a high sensitivity of 94-98% for acute aortic dissection at the standard threshold of 0.5 μg/mL, making it a valuable initial screening test, though it cannot be used as the sole diagnostic tool due to important limitations. 1, 2, 3
Sensitivity Values and Clinical Utility
The American College of Emergency Physicians clinical policy reports sensitivity values for D-dimer in acute aortic dissection:
A pooled meta-analysis of 11 studies with 349 patients found:
Limitations and False Negatives
Several important clinical scenarios can lead to false-negative D-dimer results in aortic dissection:
Time-dependent factors:
Anatomical factors:
Patient factors:
Clinical Implications
- Despite high sensitivity, D-dimer should not be used as the sole screening tool for aortic dissection 5
- A negative D-dimer result alone cannot exclude patients with potentially fatal aortic dissection conditions 4
- Even patients with negative D-dimer may require emergency surgery (44% of negative D-dimer patients had type A dissection and 33% required emergency operation due to cardiac tamponade) 4
Optimal Use in Clinical Practice
- D-dimer is most useful when combined with clinical risk stratification
- The Aortic Dissection Detection Risk Score (ADD-RS) combined with negative D-dimer has reported sensitivity of 99.9-100% 6
- CTA remains the recommended imaging modality for suspected aortic dissection with sensitivity of 99% (95% CI 91-100%) and specificity of 100% (95% CI 99-100%) 1
Important Caveats
- D-dimer lacks specificity for aortic dissection (ranges from 40-100%) 3
- Elevated in many other conditions including pulmonary embolism, myocardial infarction, pregnancy, advanced age, recent surgery, inflammatory conditions, cancer, and infections 2
- Different D-dimer assays may produce different results, and cutoff values are not transferable between methods or institutions 2
In summary, while D-dimer has high sensitivity for acute aortic dissection, clinicians must recognize its limitations and not rely solely on a negative result to exclude this potentially fatal diagnosis, particularly in patients with high clinical suspicion.