D-dimer for Ruling Out Aortic Dissection
A D-dimer value below 500 ng/mL can effectively rule out acute aortic dissection with high sensitivity, making it a valuable initial screening tool in low-risk patients. 1, 2
Diagnostic Performance of D-dimer in Aortic Dissection
Sensitivity and Negative Predictive Value
- Multiple studies demonstrate that D-dimer levels >0.5 μg/mL (500 ng/mL) have a sensitivity of 94-100% for acute aortic dissection 3, 1
- Meta-analysis data shows a pooled sensitivity of 98.0% (95% CI 96.3% to 99.1%) and negative likelihood ratio of 0.05 (95% CI 0.03 to 0.09) at the 500 ng/mL cutoff 2
- When applied to low-risk populations (prevalence ~6%), the post-test probability for aortic dissection with a negative D-dimer is only 0.3% 2
- The International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD) study found that the 500 ng/mL cutoff can reliably rule out aortic dissection with a negative likelihood ratio of 0.07 within the first 24 hours of symptom onset 4
Specificity Limitations
- D-dimer has limited specificity (41.9%; 95% CI 39.0% to 44.9%) for aortic dissection, meaning positive results require further investigation 2
- The test is elevated in numerous other conditions including pulmonary embolism, myocardial infarction, and inflammatory states 1, 5
Recent Evidence and Large Cohort Data
- A 2023 large retrospective cohort study using the TriNetX database (1,319 patients with confirmed AAD) found that a D-dimer cutoff of 500 ng/mL yielded a sensitivity of 0.930 6
- This same study showed that lowering the cutoff to 400 ng/mL improved sensitivity to 0.949 6
Important Clinical Considerations and Caveats
False Negatives and Special Cases
- Patients with intramural hematomas (a variant of aortic dissection) may have low or negative D-dimer levels 3, 5
- D-dimer levels are significantly lower in patients with thrombosed false lumens compared to those with patent false lumens 3
- The first report demonstrating limitations in D-dimer sensitivity found that 8% of patients with acute aortic dissection had negative D-dimer results 3
Timing Considerations
- D-dimer is most reliable when measured within 24 hours of symptom onset 4
- D-dimer has a relatively long half-life in circulation (approximately 16 hours), making it detectable even after the initial thrombotic event 1
Risk Stratification Approach
- In patients with concurrent ST-elevation myocardial infarction, a higher D-dimer cutoff (≥750 ng/mL) may be more appropriate for ruling out aortic dissection 7
- The Aortic Dissection Detection Risk Score (ADD-RS) combined with D-dimer testing provides enhanced diagnostic accuracy 3
- In patients with ADD-RS score of 0 and negative D-dimer, the likelihood ratio for aortic dissection was 0 in one study 3
Practical Application in Clinical Decision-Making
Recommended Algorithm
- Assess clinical risk using ADD-RS (high-risk predisposing conditions, pain features, examination features) 3
- For low-risk patients (ADD-RS score 0), obtain D-dimer test 3
- If D-dimer <500 ng/mL, aortic dissection can be reasonably ruled out 3, 2
- If D-dimer ≥500 ng/mL or ADD-RS score ≥1, proceed with advanced imaging (CT angiography, MRI, or transesophageal echocardiography) 1
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Relying solely on D-dimer without considering clinical risk factors 5
- Using D-dimer to rule out aortic dissection in patients presenting >24 hours after symptom onset 4
- Failing to recognize that intramural hematomas may present with negative D-dimer results 3
- Not considering that different D-dimer assays may have varying sensitivities and specificities 1