Is the Thessaly test considered an alternative to the McMurray test for diagnosing meniscal tears?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 18, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Thessaly Test as an Alternative to McMurray Test for Meniscal Tears

The Thessaly test is a valid alternative to the McMurray test for diagnosing meniscal tears, with comparable diagnostic accuracy, though neither test alone is sufficient for definitive diagnosis. 1

Diagnostic Accuracy of Clinical Tests for Meniscal Tears

Thessaly Test Performance

  • Sensitivity: 70-73% for medial and lateral meniscus tears 2
  • Specificity: 75-77% for medial and lateral meniscus tears 2
  • Diagnostic accuracy: 74% for both medial and lateral meniscus tears 2

McMurray Test Performance

  • Sensitivity: 69-80% for medial and lateral meniscus tears 2
  • Specificity: 73-75% for medial and lateral meniscus tears 2
  • Diagnostic accuracy: 72-76% for medial and lateral meniscus tears 2

Comparative Analysis

  • The Thessaly test has shown statistically significant better performance compared to McMurray and Apley tests in some studies 1
  • However, other research indicates comparable performance between Thessaly and McMurray tests 2
  • A 2015 study found limited utility of the Thessaly test alone, with sensitivity of 64% and specificity of 53% 3

Clinical Application

Optimal Testing Approach

  • Using a composite approach with at least two positive tests significantly enhances diagnostic accuracy:
    • For medial meniscus: 85% sensitivity, 73.3% specificity, 78% accuracy 2
    • For lateral meniscus: 92.3% sensitivity, 87.5% specificity, 90% accuracy 2

Technique for Thessaly Test

  • Patient stands flatfooted with the clinician supporting them by holding their outstretched hands
  • Patient rotates knee and body internally and externally three times with knee flexed at 20 degrees
  • Positive test: Patient experiences joint-line discomfort during rotation 4

Imaging Considerations

Role of MRI

  • MRI remains the preferred second-line imaging modality when radiographs are negative but clinical suspicion remains high 5
  • MRI has excellent diagnostic accuracy for knee pathology with sensitivity of 96% and specificity of 97% for meniscal tears 5
  • However, MRI should not be used indiscriminately due to potential false positives in the presence of concomitant knee pathology 6

Clinical Recommendations

Diagnostic Algorithm

  1. Begin with clinical examination including both Thessaly and McMurray tests
  2. Consider the test results positive if at least two clinical tests are positive
  3. If clinical examination is inconclusive but suspicion remains high, proceed with MRI
  4. Reserve arthroscopy for cases with persistent mechanical symptoms after 6-8 weeks of conservative treatment, progressive instability, or when MRI reveals pathology requiring surgical intervention 5

Pitfalls and Caveats

  • No single clinical test has sufficient diagnostic accuracy to be used in isolation
  • The Thessaly test requires patient weight-bearing and may be difficult to perform in patients with significant pain or instability
  • Clinical examination by experienced clinicians can have comparable diagnostic accuracy to MRI for meniscal lesions 1
  • Incidental MRI findings can be problematic and lead to unnecessary interventions 6

In summary, the Thessaly test is a valid alternative to the McMurray test with comparable diagnostic performance. For optimal diagnostic accuracy, clinicians should use a combination of clinical tests rather than relying on any single test alone.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.