Management of Smoldering Multiple Myeloma
For patients with smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM), the standard of care remains observation at 3-6 month intervals, with early intervention using lenalidomide ± dexamethasone or subcutaneous daratumumab considered for high-risk patients. 1
Risk Stratification
Risk stratification is essential for determining management approach:
High-Risk SMM Definition:
- Presence of ≥2 of the following:
- Bone marrow plasma cells >20%
- M-protein >2 g/dL
- Free light chain ratio >20 1
Risk Assessment Tools:
- Multiparameter flow cytometry to assess plasma cell phenotype
- Cytogenetic abnormalities
- Imaging findings
- Progression of M-protein levels over time 2, 1
Management Algorithm
Standard-Risk SMM:
High-Risk SMM:
- Clinical trial enrollment (preferred option) 1
- Early intervention options:
Evidence Supporting Early Intervention
The PETHEMA trial showed that lenalidomide plus dexamethasone in high-risk SMM significantly:
The E3A06 trial showed lenalidomide monotherapy significantly delayed progression to symptomatic disease compared to observation (HR 0.28; 95% CI, 0.12-0.62) 5
Monitoring Protocol
Laboratory Tests (every 3-6 months):
- Complete blood count with differential
- Serum chemistry (creatinine, albumin, calcium)
- Serum quantitative immunoglobulins
- Serum protein electrophoresis (SPEP) with immunofixation (SIFE)
- Serum free light chain assay
- LDH and beta-2 microglobulin as indicated 2, 1
Urine Tests (every 3-6 months):
- 24-hour urine for total protein
- Urine protein electrophoresis (UPEP)
- Urine immunofixation (UIFE) 2
Imaging (annually or as clinically indicated):
- Whole-body MRI, low-dose CT, or PET/CT
- Use same imaging modality as initial workup
- Conventional bone surveys are inadequate 2, 1
Bone Marrow Assessment:
- As clinically indicated
- Include multiparameter flow cytometry 1
Important Considerations and Pitfalls
Lifelong surveillance is essential regardless of initial risk classification, as progression risk persists indefinitely 1
Avoid misclassification: Some patients previously classified as high-risk SMM may actually have active multiple myeloma requiring treatment 1
Treatment toxicity awareness: Grade 3-4 adverse events occurred in 28% of patients on lenalidomide in the E3A06 trial 5, with neutropenia and infections being the most common serious adverse events 6
Herpes zoster prophylaxis should be considered during treatment, especially with daratumumab 1
Subcutaneous administration of daratumumab is preferred over IV for patient convenience and reduced infusion reactions 1
Recognize progression: If progression to symptomatic multiple myeloma occurs, prompt re-evaluation and initiation of appropriate systemic therapy is required 2
By following this structured approach to SMM management, clinicians can appropriately balance the risks of disease progression against treatment-related toxicities, with the goal of preventing morbidity and mortality associated with progression to symptomatic multiple myeloma.