What is the management approach for patients with smoldering multiple myeloma?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 18, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Management of Smoldering Multiple Myeloma

For patients with smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM), the standard of care remains observation at 3-6 month intervals, with early intervention using lenalidomide ± dexamethasone or subcutaneous daratumumab considered for high-risk patients. 1

Risk Stratification

Risk stratification is essential for determining management approach:

High-Risk SMM Definition:

  • Presence of ≥2 of the following:
    • Bone marrow plasma cells >20%
    • M-protein >2 g/dL
    • Free light chain ratio >20 1

Risk Assessment Tools:

  • Multiparameter flow cytometry to assess plasma cell phenotype
  • Cytogenetic abnormalities
  • Imaging findings
  • Progression of M-protein levels over time 2, 1

Management Algorithm

Standard-Risk SMM:

  1. Observation (Category 1 recommendation) 2, 1
    • No therapy initiation
    • Close monitoring every 3-6 months

High-Risk SMM:

  1. Clinical trial enrollment (preferred option) 1
  2. Early intervention options:
    • Lenalidomide ± dexamethasone (Category 2B recommendation) 2, 1
    • Subcutaneous daratumumab monotherapy for 36 months 1

Evidence Supporting Early Intervention

  • The PETHEMA trial showed that lenalidomide plus dexamethasone in high-risk SMM significantly:

    • Delayed progression to symptomatic disease (HR 0.24; 95% CI, 0.14-0.41) 2
    • Improved overall survival at 3 years (94% vs 80%; HR 0.31) 2, 3
    • Demonstrated sustained benefit after 12.5 years of follow-up (median TTP 9.5 vs 2.1 years) 4
  • The E3A06 trial showed lenalidomide monotherapy significantly delayed progression to symptomatic disease compared to observation (HR 0.28; 95% CI, 0.12-0.62) 5

Monitoring Protocol

Laboratory Tests (every 3-6 months):

  • Complete blood count with differential
  • Serum chemistry (creatinine, albumin, calcium)
  • Serum quantitative immunoglobulins
  • Serum protein electrophoresis (SPEP) with immunofixation (SIFE)
  • Serum free light chain assay
  • LDH and beta-2 microglobulin as indicated 2, 1

Urine Tests (every 3-6 months):

  • 24-hour urine for total protein
  • Urine protein electrophoresis (UPEP)
  • Urine immunofixation (UIFE) 2

Imaging (annually or as clinically indicated):

  • Whole-body MRI, low-dose CT, or PET/CT
  • Use same imaging modality as initial workup
  • Conventional bone surveys are inadequate 2, 1

Bone Marrow Assessment:

  • As clinically indicated
  • Include multiparameter flow cytometry 1

Important Considerations and Pitfalls

  • Lifelong surveillance is essential regardless of initial risk classification, as progression risk persists indefinitely 1

  • Avoid misclassification: Some patients previously classified as high-risk SMM may actually have active multiple myeloma requiring treatment 1

  • Treatment toxicity awareness: Grade 3-4 adverse events occurred in 28% of patients on lenalidomide in the E3A06 trial 5, with neutropenia and infections being the most common serious adverse events 6

  • Herpes zoster prophylaxis should be considered during treatment, especially with daratumumab 1

  • Subcutaneous administration of daratumumab is preferred over IV for patient convenience and reduced infusion reactions 1

  • Recognize progression: If progression to symptomatic multiple myeloma occurs, prompt re-evaluation and initiation of appropriate systemic therapy is required 2

By following this structured approach to SMM management, clinicians can appropriately balance the risks of disease progression against treatment-related toxicities, with the goal of preventing morbidity and mortality associated with progression to symptomatic multiple myeloma.

References

Guideline

Smoldering Multiple Myeloma Management

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Randomized Trial of Lenalidomide Versus Observation in Smoldering Multiple Myeloma.

Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2020

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.