Which type of biliary ductal injury in the Strasberg Bismuth classification (Strasberg Bismuth classification) will appear normal on Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 18, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Type A Injuries in Strasberg-Bismuth Classification Will Appear Normal on ERCP

In the Strasberg-Bismuth classification for biliary ductal injury, Type A injuries will appear normal on ERCP because they involve peripheral bile leaks from the cystic duct stump or minor ducts in the liver bed (ducts of Luschka) while the main biliary tree structure remains intact. 1

Understanding Type A Injuries

Type A injuries are characterized by:

  • Bile leaks from the cystic duct stump or minor ducts in the liver bed (ducts of Luschka)
  • Intact main biliary tree structure
  • Normal appearance of the main biliary tree on cholangiography
  • Peripheral nature of the injury that may not be directly visualized during ERCP

These injuries present a unique diagnostic challenge because while the main biliary tree appears normal on ERCP, the actual injury involves peripheral structures that may only be detected by contrast extravasation during the procedure 1.

Diagnostic Features of Different Strasberg-Bismuth Types on ERCP

Type Description ERCP Appearance
A Bile leaks from cystic duct stump or minor ducts Normal main biliary tree with possible contrast extravasation
B Occlusion of part of biliary tree Abnormal - non-filling of occluded segment
C Transection of aberrant right hepatic duct Abnormal - non-visualization of sectoral duct
D Lateral injury to major bile ducts Abnormal - contrast extravasation from main duct
E (1-5) Major injury to common hepatic/bile duct Abnormal - major structural abnormalities

Clinical Implications

The normal appearance of the biliary tree on ERCP in Type A injuries has important clinical implications:

  • May lead to false reassurance if only the main biliary tree is assessed
  • Requires careful inspection for contrast extravasation during the procedure
  • Necessitates correlation with clinical presentation (bile leak, biliary peritonitis, biloma)
  • Often requires additional diagnostic modalities for complete evaluation

Management Approach for Type A Injuries

Despite appearing normal on initial ERCP assessment, Type A injuries still require proper management:

  1. Initial observation with drainage if a drain is already in place
  2. If bile leak persists, ERCP with biliary sphincterotomy and stent placement becomes mandatory
  3. ERCP with stenting is highly effective for Type A injuries, with success rates approaching 90% 1

Diagnostic Pitfalls to Avoid

When evaluating potential biliary injuries:

  • Don't rely solely on the appearance of the main biliary tree
  • Look specifically for contrast extravasation during ERCP
  • Consider complementary imaging like MRCP with hepatobiliary contrast agents for better visualization of bile leaks
  • Remember that normal-appearing ducts on ERCP don't exclude Type A injuries

Conclusion

Type A injuries in the Strasberg-Bismuth classification present with a normal-appearing main biliary tree on ERCP, making them unique among the classification types. This normal appearance occurs because the injury involves peripheral structures while the main biliary architecture remains intact.

References

Guideline

Bile Duct Injuries Diagnosis and Treatment

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.