First and Second Generation Long-Acting Insulins
First-generation long-acting insulins include NPH (Neutral Protamine Hagedorn) insulin, while second-generation long-acting insulins include insulin glargine, insulin detemir, insulin degludec, and U-300 glargine. 1
First-Generation Long-Acting Insulins
- NPH (Neutral Protamine Hagedorn) insulin
Second-Generation Long-Acting Insulins
Insulin glargine (U-100)
Insulin detemir
- Long-acting insulin analog with lower intraindividual variability
- Lower day-to-day variability compared to NPH and glargine
- Associated with less weight gain compared to NPH insulin 1
Insulin degludec
Insulin glargine U-300
- Higher concentration formulation of insulin glargine
- Longer duration of action than U-100
- Less variable plasma insulin exposure
- Associated with lower incidence of hypoglycemic events 5
Key Differences Between Generations
Pharmacokinetic profile:
Hypoglycemia risk:
- Second-generation long-acting analogs show lower risk of hypoglycemia, particularly nocturnal hypoglycemia, compared to NPH insulin 6, 1
- In clinical trials, long-acting basal analogs (U-100 glargine or detemir) demonstrated reduced risk of symptomatic and nocturnal hypoglycemia compared with NPH insulin 6
Consistency of action:
Clinical Implications
Second-generation long-acting insulins offer several advantages:
- More predictable glucose control due to flatter action profile
- Reduced risk of hypoglycemia, especially nocturnal hypoglycemia
- Once-daily dosing for most patients
- Less weight gain with some formulations (particularly detemir) 1
The American Diabetes Association notes that despite the advantages of insulin analogs, for some patients the expense may be prohibitive, and NPH remains a viable option 6
When initiating basal insulin therapy, starting doses can be estimated based on body weight (0.1–0.2 units/kg/day) and the degree of hyperglycemia 6
Newest Developments
The newest second-generation long-acting insulins (U-300 glargine and degludec) offer even more prolonged and stable glucose-lowering effects compared to earlier second-generation insulins, with potential for further reductions in hypoglycemia risk 7, 8.