Can gallstones be visible on a computed tomography (CT) scan but not on an ultrasound?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 18, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Gallstones Can Be Visible on CT but Not on Ultrasound

Yes, gallstones can be visible on CT scans but missed on ultrasound examinations, particularly when they are small, non-calcified, or located in areas difficult to visualize with ultrasound. 1

Why Gallstones May Be Missed on Ultrasound

Ultrasound is generally considered the first-line imaging modality for detecting gallstones, but it has several limitations:

  • Operator dependency: The quality and accuracy of ultrasound depends heavily on the technician's skill 1, 2
  • Body habitus limitations: Obesity significantly reduces ultrasound sensitivity 3
  • Bowel gas interference: Overlying bowel gas can obscure visualization of the biliary tract 1
  • Stone characteristics: Small stones (<5mm) are more difficult to detect 1
  • Stone location: Stones in the common bile duct are particularly challenging to visualize with ultrasound, with sensitivity ranging from only 22.5% to 75% 1

CT Detection of Gallstones

CT can detect gallstones that ultrasound misses in several scenarios:

  • Calcified stones: CT is excellent at detecting partially or completely calcified biliary calculi 1
  • Improved technology: Modern multidetector CT (MDCT) with isotropic reconstructions allows for better visualization of calculi that might be missed on ultrasound 1
  • Vicarious contrast excretion: In some cases, intravenous contrast can be excreted into the gallbladder, allowing visualization of non-calcified stones as filling defects on delayed imaging 4

However, CT also has limitations:

  • Non-calcified stones: CT is less sensitive for detecting purely cholesterol or bilirubinate stones, which make up approximately 80% of gallstones 1
  • Contrast timing: Without proper contrast timing or delayed imaging, many gallstones may be missed 4

Comparative Performance

The American College of Radiology guidelines acknowledge that while ultrasound is the recommended initial imaging modality for suspected gallbladder disease, it has limitations 2:

  • Ultrasound has a false-negative rate of approximately 1.3% for gallstone detection 5
  • In obese patients, CT cholecystography has been shown to be more sensitive and specific than ultrasound for gallstone detection 3
  • For common bile duct stones (choledocholithiasis), ultrasound has a missed diagnosis rate of up to 44.95% 6

Clinical Implications

When gallstone disease is strongly suspected but ultrasound is negative:

  • Consider CT as a follow-up imaging modality, particularly if the patient is obese or has significant bowel gas 1, 3
  • CT is especially valuable when assessing for complications of gallbladder disease such as emphysematous cholecystitis, hemorrhagic cholecystitis, or gallbladder perforation 7
  • In cases where both ultrasound and CT are inconclusive, MRCP (magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography) offers the highest diagnostic accuracy, particularly for biliary stones 6

Key Takeaway

While ultrasound remains the initial imaging modality of choice for suspected gallstone disease due to its safety, availability, and lack of radiation, it's important to recognize its limitations. CT scanning can detect gallstones missed by ultrasound, particularly when they are calcified or when patient factors limit ultrasound visualization. When clinical suspicion remains high despite a negative ultrasound, additional imaging with CT or MRCP should be considered.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.