Management of Vascular Causes of Paraplegia
Immediate recognition and referral to a vascular team is essential for managing vascular causes of paraplegia to maximize chances of limb salvage and neurological recovery.
Etiology of Vascular Paraplegia
Vascular causes of paraplegia include:
Aortic pathologies:
Spinal cord vascular compromise:
Iatrogenic causes:
- Complications from vascular surgery
- Contrast media neurotoxicity 4
- Radiation-induced vascular injury
- Complications from angiography
Diagnostic Approach
Immediate Assessment
- Complete neurological examination to determine level and extent of deficit
- Vascular examination including measurement of ankle-brachial index (ABI) 5
- Bilateral arm blood pressure measurement to assess for subclavian artery stenosis 5
Imaging Studies
First-line:
Second-line:
- Selective spinal angiography for suspected spinal arteriovenous malformations
- Arterial duplex ultrasound for peripheral vascular assessment 5
Management Protocol
Acute Management
Emergency Intervention (within 6 hours):
Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Drainage:
- Indicated for patients with thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair at high risk for spinal cord ischemia 6
- Maintain CSF pressure between 10-15 mmHg (136-204 mm H₂O) 6
- Limit drainage to 150-200 mL/day to prevent overdrainage complications 6
- Do not leave drains in place for more than 5 days due to infection risk 6
Neuroprotective Strategies:
Revascularization Options
For lower extremity PAD causing spinal cord ischemia:
Endovascular Approach:
Surgical Approach:
Specific Interventions:
- Section of right diaphragmatic crus and release of lumbar artery for compression by diaphragmatic crus 3
- Endovascular treatment of spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas
Intraoperative Monitoring
For surgical interventions affecting spinal cord blood supply:
- Combined multimodal monitoring using Somatosensory Evoked Potentials (SSEPs) and Motor Evoked Potentials (MEPs) 6
- Train of Four monitoring to assess neuromuscular blockade 6
Post-Intervention Care
Monitoring:
Follow-up Protocol:
Medical Therapy:
Prognosis and Outcomes
- Operative mortality nearly 3-fold higher in patients with persistent spinal cord injury (38% vs 13%) 6
- 5-year survival significantly worse without return of neurological function (28% vs 75%) 6
- Approximately 57% of patients with delayed deficits experience improvement in neurological function 6
- Delayed-onset spinal cord injury accounts for nearly 60% of all spinal cord deficits after TAAA repair 6
Common Pitfalls and Caveats
- Failure to recognize and rapidly treat reversible causes of paraplegia
- Inadequate blood pressure management leading to spinal cord hypoperfusion
- Delayed intervention beyond the critical window for neurological recovery
- Overlooking the possibility of embolization from thoracic aortic plaques as a cause of paraplegia 1
- Neglecting to maintain high mean arterial pressure during and after intervention 7
- Inadequate CSF drainage protocol implementation 7