What are the types of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) orthobiologics?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 20, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Types of Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) Orthobiologics

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) orthobiologics can be classified into four main types based on leukocyte content and red blood cell presence: PRP, Leukocyte-rich PRP (L-PRP), Platelet-rich fibrin (PRF), and Leukocyte-rich platelet-rich fibrin (L-PRF), with each having red blood cell-rich variants. 1

Primary Classification System

According to the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) classification system, PRP products are categorized based on three key components:

  1. Cellular Content:

    • PRP (without leukocytes, <1% of total cell count)
    • L-PRP (with leukocytes, ≥1% of total cell count)
    • PRF (fibrin-based without leukocytes)
    • L-PRF (fibrin-based with leukocytes)
  2. Red Blood Cell Content:

    • Standard versions (minimal RBCs, <10% of total cell count)
    • Red-cell rich variants (≥10% of total cell count):
      • Red-PRP
      • Red-L-PRP
      • Red-PRF
      • Red-L-PRF
  3. Activation Status:

    • Type I: No activation
    • Type II: With activation
    • Type III: Other activation methods 1

Additional Classification Parameters

The comprehensive classification also includes:

  • Platelet Concentration:

    • Category A: Low concentration (<900,000 platelets/μL)
    • Category B: Medium concentration (900,000-1,700,000 platelets/μL)
    • Category C: High concentration (>1,700,000 platelets/μL) 1, 2
  • Preparation Method:

    1. Gravitational centrifugation techniques
    2. Standard cell separators
    3. Autologous selective filtration technology (plateletpheresis) 1, 2

Clinical Relevance of Different PRP Types

The different PRP formulations have varying biological properties and potential clinical applications:

  • Standard PRP: Contains minimal leukocytes and RBCs, providing concentrated growth factors with reduced inflammatory potential

  • L-PRP: Contains leukocytes that contribute immune and antibacterial properties, but may increase inflammatory response

  • PRF and L-PRF: Provide a fibrin scaffold that can act as a temporary matrix to assist tissue repair 1

  • Red blood cell-rich variants: Contain significant RBC content, which may affect the biological activity of the preparation 1

Preparation Considerations

PRP preparation involves several critical steps:

  • Blood collection: Typically using trisodium citrate as the anticoagulant (EDTA should be avoided as it damages platelets) 2

  • Centrifugation: Low-g centrifugation for short periods maximizes platelet yield while maintaining viability 2

  • Activation: May occur naturally upon contact with collagen-rich tissues or be induced prior to application 2

Clinical Applications

Different PRP formulations may be more suitable for specific orthopedic applications:

  • For tendinopathies: Leukocyte-rich PRP (L-PRP) has shown efficacy, particularly for lateral epicondylitis 2, 3

  • For osteoarthritis: Leukocyte-poor PRP (LP-PRP) is generally preferred 2, 3

  • For patellar tendinopathy: L-PRP has demonstrated moderate evidence of efficacy 3

Limitations and Challenges

The field of PRP orthobiologics faces several challenges:

  • Lack of standardization in preparation methods
  • Variability in platelet concentration
  • Differences in cellular content
  • Variability in activation techniques
  • Heterogeneity in application methods 2

These factors contribute to inconsistent clinical outcomes and make direct comparison between studies difficult.

Future Directions

For optimal use of PRP orthobiologics:

  • Standardization of preparation protocols is essential
  • Large-scale clinical trials with proper design are needed
  • Better understanding of which PRP type is optimal for specific conditions is required 2

The classification system proposed by the ISTH provides a framework for standardized reporting and comparison of PRP preparations, which is crucial for advancing the field of orthobiologic therapy.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Regenerative Medicine Guidelines

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Current Clinical Recommendations for Use of Platelet-Rich Plasma.

Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine, 2018

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.