Components of Liver Function Tests (LFTs)
Liver function tests (LFTs) include alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT), bilirubin, albumin, and prothrombin time/international normalized ratio (PT/INR). 1
Core Components of LFTs
Hepatocellular Injury Markers:
ALT (Alanine Aminotransferase)
- More specific for liver injury than AST
- Normal levels: 29-33 IU/L in men, 19-25 IU/L in women 1
AST (Aspartate Aminotransferase)
- Less specific than ALT (also found in heart, skeletal muscle, kidneys, brain, and red blood cells)
- Elevation patterns help distinguish liver disease types
Cholestatic Markers:
ALP (Alkaline Phosphatase)
- Elevated in cholestatic liver disease
- Can indicate biliary obstruction 1
GGT (Gamma-Glutamyl Transpeptidase)
- Confirms hepatic origin of ALP elevation
- Sensitive but not specific for liver disease 1
Liver Function Indicators:
Bilirubin (Total and Direct)
- Reflects liver's ability to take up, process, and secrete bilirubin
- Elevated in various liver and biliary conditions 1
Albumin
- True marker of hepatocellular synthetic function
- Decreased levels indicate chronic liver disease 1
PT/INR (Prothrombin Time/International Normalized Ratio)
- True marker of liver synthetic function
- Prolonged in advanced liver disease 1
Additional Tests Often Included with LFTs
Total Protein
- Reflects both albumin and globulin levels 2
Platelet Count
- Surrogate marker for portal hypertension
- Helps assess degree of fibrosis 1
Pattern Recognition in LFTs
Hepatocellular Pattern:
- Predominant elevation of ALT and AST
- Severity classification:
Cholestatic Pattern:
Mixed Pattern:
- Elevation of both transaminases and cholestatic enzymes 3
Clinical Utility and Limitations
- LFTs are not truly "liver function tests" but rather markers of liver injury or cholestasis 1, 4
- True liver function is better assessed by albumin, PT/INR, and bilirubin 1
- When used in isolation, LFTs have limited diagnostic specificity 1, 4
- Most effective when interpreted as a panel rather than individual tests 4
Practical Considerations
- ALT and ALP represent the most efficient restricted panel when screening for liver disease in primary care 5
- Abnormal LFTs should be interpreted in the context of previous results and clinical condition 1
- The extent of abnormality doesn't necessarily correlate with clinical significance 1
- Genetic factors account for 20-77% of variation in LFT values 2
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Assuming all LFT abnormalities indicate liver disease (AST can be elevated in cardiac, muscle, and other conditions)
- Failing to consider the pattern of abnormalities (hepatocellular vs. cholestatic)
- Over-reliance on absolute values without considering trends
- Neglecting to assess true liver function (albumin, PT/INR) in addition to injury markers
Remember that LFTs should be interpreted as a panel rather than in isolation, and patterns of abnormality often provide more diagnostic information than individual test results.