NAFLD Fibrosis Test: Screening for Advanced Fibrosis in Fatty Liver Disease
The NAFLD fibrosis test screens for the presence of clinically significant liver fibrosis (stage 2 or higher) in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, which is the most important predictor of liver-related morbidity and mortality. 1
Purpose and Components of NAFLD Fibrosis Tests
NAFLD fibrosis tests are non-invasive methods to identify patients who are at increased risk of having advanced liver fibrosis without requiring a liver biopsy. The most commonly used tests include:
FIB-4 Score
- Calculated using age, AST, ALT, and platelet count
- Most validated and recommended as first-line assessment 1
- Cut-off values:
- <1.3: Low risk of advanced fibrosis (high negative predictive value of 92.7%)
- 1.3-2.67: Intermediate risk
2.67: High risk of advanced fibrosis 2
NAFLD Fibrosis Score (NFS)
- Calculated using six variables: age, BMI, hyperglycemia, platelet count, albumin, and AST/ALT ratio 3
- Cut-off values:
- <-1.455: Advanced fibrosis can be excluded with high accuracy (negative predictive value of 88-93%)
0.676: Presence of advanced fibrosis likely (positive predictive value of 82-90%) 1
Clinical Significance
Identifying advanced fibrosis is crucial because:
Mortality prediction: Fibrosis stage is the strongest predictor of liver and non-liver related outcomes in NAFLD patients 1
Treatment decisions: Patients with stage F2 or higher fibrosis may benefit from intensive lifestyle interventions or pharmacotherapy 1
Risk stratification: Allows clinicians to identify which patients need closer monitoring or referral to specialty care 1
Avoidance of unnecessary biopsies: Using these non-invasive tests can reduce the need for liver biopsies by approximately 75% 3
Two-Tier Testing Approach
Current guidelines recommend a two-tier approach for fibrosis assessment 1:
- First tier: Simple non-proprietary scores (FIB-4 or NAFLD Fibrosis Score)
- Second tier: For indeterminate results, proceed to:
- Specialized blood tests (ELF test, FibroMeter)
- Imaging-based elastography (vibration-controlled transient elastography, shear wave elastography, or MR elastography)
Limitations and Considerations
- FIB-4 and NFS have high negative predictive value but limited positive predictive value in low-prevalence settings 4
- Age affects the performance of these scores, with potentially different thresholds needed for older patients 1
- Obesity can limit the accuracy of some elastography techniques 1
- These tests identify fibrosis but cannot distinguish NASH from simple steatosis 1
Target Populations for NAFLD Fibrosis Testing
Testing is particularly recommended for three high-risk groups 1:
- All patients with type 2 diabetes
- Patients with two or more metabolic risk factors (obesity, hypertension, dyslipidemia, prediabetes)
- Patients with incidental findings of hepatic steatosis or elevated aminotransferases
Clinical Algorithm for NAFLD Fibrosis Assessment
- Calculate FIB-4 score for initial risk stratification
- Based on results:
- Low score (<1.3): Reassure and manage metabolic risk factors
- Intermediate score (1.3-2.67): Proceed to second-tier testing
- High score (>2.67): Consider referral for specialist evaluation
By implementing this approach, clinicians can identify patients at highest risk for adverse liver-related outcomes and prioritize appropriate interventions to reduce morbidity and mortality.