What are the sensitivity and specificity of occult blood tests (FOBT - Fecal Occult Blood Test) in stools?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 21, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Sensitivity and Specificity of Fecal Occult Blood Tests (FOBTs)

Immunochemical fecal occult blood tests (iFOBTs) have superior sensitivity and specificity compared to guaiac-based tests (gFOBTs), with iFOBTs demonstrating approximately 79% sensitivity (range 69-86%) and 94% specificity (range 92-95%) for colorectal cancer detection. 1

Types of Fecal Occult Blood Tests and Their Performance

Guaiac-based FOBTs (gFOBTs)

  • Sensitivity for colorectal cancer: 50-75% (95% CI: 0.09-1.0) 2
  • Specificity for colorectal cancer: 96-98% (95% CI: 0.95-0.99) 2
  • Sensitivity for advanced adenomas: Much lower at 6-17% (95% CI: 0.02-0.23) 2
  • High-sensitivity gFOBTs perform better than standard gFOBTs 2

Immunochemical FOBTs (iFOBTs/FITs)

  • Sensitivity for colorectal cancer: 74% (95% CI: 0.64-0.83) for OC-Sensor family 2
  • Specificity for colorectal cancer: 94% (95% CI: 0.93-0.96) 2
  • Sensitivity for advanced adenomas: 23% (95% CI: 0.20-0.25) 2
  • No dietary restrictions required, unlike gFOBTs 1

Stool DNA-FIT (Combined Test)

  • Highest sensitivity for colorectal cancer: 93% (95% CI: 0.87-1.0) 2
  • Lower specificity than FIT alone: 84% (95% CI: 0.84-0.86) 2
  • Better sensitivity for advanced adenomas: 43% (95% CI: 0.40-0.46) 2

Factors Affecting Test Performance

Anatomical Location

  • iFOBTs show significantly lower sensitivity for proximal (right-sided) lesions compared to distal (left-sided) lesions
  • Sensitivity for left-sided advanced neoplasia: 33% (95% CI: 26-41%) 3
  • Sensitivity for right-sided advanced neoplasia: 20% (95% CI: 11-31%) 3
  • This difference may be partly explained by adenoma morphology, with pedunculated lesions (more common on the left side) being more likely to bleed 3

Cancer Stage

  • Sensitivity increases with advancing cancer stage
  • For iFOBT: 50% for Dukes' stage A, 70% for Dukes' stage B, and 78.3% for Dukes' stages C or D 4
  • Significantly higher sensitivity for stages III and IV compared to stages I and II 5

Test Handling and Storage

  • iFOBT samples are stable for 21 days when refrigerated at 4°C 6
  • Significant degradation occurs at higher temperatures (3.7% decay/day at 28°C) 6
  • Proper sample collection and handling are critical for accurate results

Clinical Implications

  1. Test Selection: iFOBTs generally offer better performance than gFOBTs, with higher sensitivity for cancer detection while maintaining excellent specificity 1

  2. Testing Frequency: Annual testing is recommended due to the limited sensitivity of a single test, especially for early-stage cancers and advanced adenomas 2, 1

  3. Follow-up Protocol: Any positive FOBT result must be followed by diagnostic colonoscopy 2, 1

  4. Common Pitfalls:

    • Inadequate follow-up of positive results
    • Single in-office testing (instead of multiple samples)
    • Delayed colonoscopy after positive results
    • Misinterpreting negative results as definitive (false reassurance) 1
  5. Test Threshold: For iFOBTs, sensitivity can be adjusted by altering the hemoglobin threshold, with lower thresholds increasing sensitivity but decreasing specificity 1

FOBTs are valuable screening tools for colorectal cancer, but their limitations must be understood, particularly their lower sensitivity for early-stage cancers and advanced adenomas, which necessitates regular repeated testing in screening programs.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.