Are apps more effective than traditional methods for cognitive improvement?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 21, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Apps for Cognitive Improvement: Evidence and Effectiveness

Traditional methods currently remain superior to apps for cognitive improvement due to limited evidence supporting app effectiveness, poor implementation of evidence-based techniques, and significant concerns about data privacy and security in available cognitive training applications.

Current State of Cognitive Training Apps

Evidence Base

The evidence supporting cognitive improvement apps is limited and of low quality. According to a systematic assessment of mental health apps:

  • Only 6 out of 17 apps with published research were evaluated using randomized clinical trials, confirming the lack of evidence supporting publicly available apps 1
  • Most apps claiming to be "evidence-based" make claims based on indirect evidence rather than direct evaluation 1
  • A review of over 100 apps claiming to offer cognitive-behavioral therapy found only 10% contained features consistent with CBT principles, with only 2 apps having above 50% of qualifying criteria 1

App Quality and Implementation Issues

The quality of cognitive training apps varies significantly:

  • Recent evaluations of cognitive training apps for older adults with cognitive impairment found quality scores ranging from 2.38 to 4.13 (on a 5-point scale), with functionality scoring highest but engagement scoring lowest 2
  • Many apps lack personalization beyond basic features like usernames or sex-appropriate pronouns 1
  • Only 20.8% of cognitive training apps offer user-tailored training modules, and just 33% involve medical professionals in development 2

Privacy and Security Concerns

A major drawback of cognitive improvement apps is data privacy:

  • App developers often share user data with third parties, including advertising companies, even when not stated in privacy policies 1
  • Many apps allow third-party services to install code that secretly accesses user data 1
  • Only 92% of mental health apps offer privacy policies, and many lack transparency about data sharing 3

Specific Cognitive Domains and Features

When selecting cognitive training apps, consider those that address multiple cognitive domains:

  • Most effective apps include cognitive restructuring (found in 79% of mental health apps), which helps identify and reframe automatic thoughts 3
  • Relaxation techniques are available in 55% of apps and can support cognitive function 3
  • Mood monitoring features (available in 67% of apps) can help track emotional states that affect cognitive performance 3

Comparing Apps vs. Traditional Methods

Advantages of Apps

  • Increased accessibility and convenience
  • Potential for continuous updates based on new evidence
  • Interactive features that may improve engagement 1
  • Ability to deliver interventions at the user's preferred time and place 4

Disadvantages of Apps

  • High dropout rates limit effectiveness 1
  • Limited personalization of content 1
  • Poor implementation of evidence-based techniques 1
  • Significant privacy and security concerns 1, 3
  • Most publicly available apps lack direct evidence of effectiveness 1

Recommendations for Selecting Cognitive Training Apps

If using apps for cognitive improvement:

  1. Prioritize apps that have been directly evaluated in research studies
  2. Look for apps that include multiple cognitive domains (most only address 1-2 domains) 5
  3. Select apps with transparent privacy policies that clearly explain data usage 3
  4. Consider apps developed with healthcare professional involvement 2
  5. Look for engagement features like reminders and personalization that improve adherence 1

Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Assuming an app is effective because it claims to be "evidence-based" without verifying the evidence
  • Using apps that lack clear privacy policies or transparency about data sharing
  • Expecting significant cognitive improvement from apps alone without complementary traditional approaches
  • Overlooking the need for personalization in cognitive training

Until more rigorous research demonstrates the effectiveness of cognitive training apps, traditional evidence-based cognitive training methods remain the more reliable approach for cognitive improvement.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.