What is the significance of a positive bubble study on an echocardiogram?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 21, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Significance of a Positive Bubble Study on Echocardiogram

A positive bubble study on echocardiography primarily indicates the presence of an intracardiac shunt, most commonly a patent foramen ovale (PFO), which allows abnormal blood flow between the right and left sides of the heart. 1 The timing and quantity of bubbles appearing in the left heart provide crucial diagnostic information that guides clinical management decisions.

Diagnostic Interpretation

Timing of Bubble Appearance

  • Within 3-8 cardiac cycles: Indicates an intracardiac shunt (typically PFO) 1
  • After 8 cardiac cycles: Suggests an intrapulmonary shunt (such as pulmonary arteriovenous malformation) 1, 2

Grading of Shunt Severity

  • Grade 1: <30 bubbles
  • Grade 2: Moderate filling
  • Grade 3: Complete opacification of the left atrium 1

Clinical Significance

  1. Cryptogenic Stroke: A positive bubble study in patients with cryptogenic stroke may identify PFO as a potential stroke mechanism through paradoxical embolism 1, 3

  2. Pulmonary Conditions:

    • Detection of intrapulmonary arteriovenous shunts in hepatopulmonary syndrome 4
    • Identification of pulmonary arteriovenous malformations 5, 6
  3. Hypoxemia: Can explain refractory hypoxemia in certain clinical scenarios 1

  4. Risk Assessment:

    • Presence of PFO in patients with pulmonary embolism increases risk of death (RR 2.4) and ischemic stroke (RR 5.9) 1
    • PFO with atrial septal aneurysm significantly increases embolic risk 1

Important Considerations

Limitations of Echocardiographic Bubble Studies

  • Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) may miss shunts that are detectable by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) or transcranial Doppler (TCD) 4, 2
  • In one study, 25% of patients had positive TCD bubble studies but negative echocardiograms, particularly those with active malignancy or extracardiac shunts 2

Potential Complications

  • Rare but reported cerebral ischemic events during or shortly after bubble studies (0.1% risk) 3, 7
  • Patients with pre-existing right-to-left shunts appear to be at higher risk for these complications 7

Management Implications

  1. For Cryptogenic Stroke:

    • PFO closure plus antiplatelet therapy is recommended for patients with cryptogenic stroke, large right-to-left shunt, and atrial septal aneurysm, especially in those ≤60 years 1
    • PFO closure reduces recurrent stroke risk by 8.7% over 5 years but carries a 3.6% risk of procedure-related adverse events 1
  2. For Other Conditions:

    • In hepatopulmonary syndrome, liver transplantation may be the only effective treatment 4
    • Pulmonary arteriovenous malformations identified by bubble study may require transcatheter intervention 5, 6
  3. Follow-up Testing:

    • Positive bubble studies without obvious cardiac shunt on echocardiography warrant evaluation for extracardiac shunts, particularly pulmonary arteriovenous malformations or occult malignancy 2, 6
    • TEE is recommended for detailed assessment of atrial septal anatomy when TTE is inconclusive 1

Post-Intervention Monitoring

  • After PFO closure, persistent positive bubble studies occur in approximately 19.5% of patients at 4 months, decreasing to 8.4% at 11 months 5
  • Persistent shunting may be due to incomplete closure or additional sources of right-to-left shunting 5

A positive bubble study should never be dismissed as incidental without thorough evaluation, as its detection often leads to important diagnostic and therapeutic decisions that can significantly impact patient outcomes.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.