Why is a strep (streptococcal) screen not routinely checked in children under 2 years old with pharyngitis?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 22, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Why Strep Screening is Not Routinely Recommended in Children Under 2 Years Old with Pharyngitis

Strep screening is not routinely recommended in children under 2 years old with pharyngitis because Group A Streptococcal (GAS) pharyngitis is uncommon in this age group, and the risk of developing acute rheumatic fever (ARF) - the most serious complication - is extremely rare in children under 3 years of age. 1

Epidemiological Rationale

  • Low prevalence: GAS pharyngitis primarily occurs in children 5-15 years of age, making it uncommon in children under 2 years 1
  • Extremely rare complications: Reports of acute rheumatic fever in children under 3 years are very rare 1
    • In a large study from Salt Lake City, only 5% of ARF cases involved children under 5 years, with a median age of 4 years 1
    • This is likely because multiple exposures to GAS or immune system priming is needed before developing the immune response that leads to rheumatic fever 1

Clinical Presentation Differences

  • In children under 3 years, GAS infection typically presents differently than in older children:

    • Fever with mucopurulent rhinitis
    • Excoriated nares
    • Diffuse adenopathy
    • Exudative pharyngitis is rare in this age group 1
  • These symptoms often overlap with viral infections, making clinical differentiation difficult 1

Evidence-Based Recommendations

The Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) explicitly states:

  • "Diagnostic studies for GAS pharyngitis are not indicated for children <3 years old because acute rheumatic fever is rare in children <3 years old and the incidence of streptococcal pharyngitis and the classic presentation of streptococcal pharyngitis are uncommon in this age group." 1

Exceptions to Consider

While routine testing is not recommended, there are specific situations where testing younger children may be appropriate:

  • Children with risk factors such as an older sibling with GAS infection 1
  • Children between 2-3 years may have higher rates of GAS than those under 2 years 2
    • One study found 29% of children 2-3 years with pharyngeal erythema were positive for GAS compared to only 7% of controls 2

Clinical Approach

For children under 2 years with pharyngitis:

  1. Focus on symptomatic management appropriate for age 3
  2. Consider testing only if specific risk factors exist (e.g., older sibling with GAS)
  3. Be aware that clinical findings alone cannot reliably distinguish bacterial from viral pharyngitis 4

Potential Pitfalls

  • Unnecessary antibiotic use: Testing and treating young children unnecessarily can lead to antibiotic resistance, side effects, and increased healthcare costs
  • False reassurance: Even in older children, symptoms and signs (individually or combined) cannot definitively rule in or rule out streptococcal pharyngitis 4
  • Missing true cases: If testing is indicated due to risk factors, physical examination alone is insufficient to identify GAS pharyngitis 2

By following these evidence-based guidelines, clinicians can avoid unnecessary testing and treatment while appropriately managing pharyngitis in children under 2 years of age.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Treatment of Group A Streptococcus Infections

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.