What is the recommended initial treatment approach for patients with multiple myeloma?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 22, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Initial Treatment Approach for Multiple Myeloma

The recommended initial treatment for multiple myeloma is D-VRd (daratumumab, bortezomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone) as the preferred induction regimen, followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in eligible patients, and maintenance therapy with lenalidomide until disease progression. 1

Risk-Adapted Treatment Algorithm

Step 1: Initial Assessment and Risk Stratification

  • Determine transplant eligibility (age, comorbidities, performance status)
  • Assess cytogenetic risk profile (high-risk features include del(17p), t(4;14), t(14;16), and high plasma cell labeling index ≥3%)
  • Evaluate renal function (for dose adjustments)

Step 2: Induction Therapy (3-6 cycles)

  • First choice: D-VRd (daratumumab, bortezomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone)

    • Superior progression-free survival (84.3% vs 67.7% at 48 months) compared to VRd alone 1
    • Daratumumab 16 mg/kg IV combined with standard VRd regimen
  • Alternative: VRd (bortezomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone)

    • Standard triplet regimen with established efficacy 1
    • Bortezomib 1.3 mg/m² (subcutaneous preferred over IV to reduce peripheral neuropathy)
    • Lenalidomide 25 mg days 1-21 of 28-day cycle
    • Dexamethasone 40 mg weekly (reduced to 20 mg for patients >75 years)

Step 3: Stem Cell Collection and Transplantation

  • Collect stem cells early, especially with lenalidomide-based regimens (after 4-6 cycles) 1
  • Proceed to ASCT in eligible patients
    • ASCT significantly improves progression-free survival compared to continued RVd alone (50 months vs 36 months) 1
  • Consider tandem ASCT if not achieving VGPR after first transplant, particularly for high-risk cytogenetics 1

Step 4: Consolidation (Optional)

  • Consider 2-4 cycles of the original induction regimen post-ASCT

Step 5: Maintenance Therapy

  • Lenalidomide maintenance until disease progression or intolerance 1
    • Provides almost 2-fold advantage in progression-free survival 1
  • For high-risk patients: Consider bortezomib-based maintenance 1

Special Considerations

Elderly or Frail Patients (>75 years)

  • Reduce dexamethasone dose to 8-20 mg weekly 1
  • Consider dose adjustments for other agents
  • May not be eligible for ASCT

Renal Impairment

  • Adjust lenalidomide dose based on creatinine clearance 1
  • Bortezomib does not require dose adjustment for renal impairment 1

High-Risk Cytogenetics

  • D-VRd strongly recommended over VRd 1
  • Consider more intensive maintenance strategies

Supportive Care (Essential Components)

  • Bone health: Bisphosphonates with calcium and vitamin D supplementation 1
  • Infection prophylaxis:
    • Pneumocystis jiroveci prophylaxis for patients on high-dose steroids
    • Herpes zoster prophylaxis for patients on proteasome inhibitors
    • Seasonal influenza and pneumococcal vaccinations 1
  • Thromboprophylaxis: Antithrombotic prophylaxis for patients on immunomodulators 1

Response Assessment

  • Monitor with full blood count, serum and urine electrophoresis, free light chain determination, creatinine, calcium, and β2-microglobulin every 3-6 months 1
  • Complete response (CR): Negative serum/urine immunofixation and <5% plasma cells in bone marrow 1
  • Very good partial response (VGPR): ≥90% reduction of serum M-component 1
  • Consider minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment to evaluate treatment efficacy 1

Evidence from Clinical Trials

The CASSIOPEIA trial demonstrated that adding daratumumab to the VTd regimen (D-VTd) significantly improved stringent complete response rates (28.9% vs 20.3%, p=0.0010) and reduced the risk of progression or death by 53% compared to VTd alone (HR=0.47) 2. While this trial used thalidomide rather than lenalidomide, it supports the benefit of adding daratumumab to induction therapy.

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Delaying transplant evaluation in eligible patients 1
  • Using fixed-duration therapy instead of continuous therapy 1
  • Overlooking cytogenetic risk stratification 1
  • Failing to adjust doses for elderly or frail patients 1
  • Not providing appropriate supportive care (bisphosphonates, thromboprophylaxis, antiviral prophylaxis) 1
  • Neglecting early stem cell collection with lenalidomide-based regimens 1

By following this risk-adapted approach with combination therapies including proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory drugs, monoclonal antibodies, and stem cell transplantation for eligible patients, outcomes for patients with multiple myeloma can be optimized.

References

Guideline

Multiple Myeloma Treatment Guidelines

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.