What is the management for an adnexal mass?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 22, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Management of Adnexal Masses

Transvaginal ultrasound combined with transabdominal ultrasound is the essential first-line imaging modality for evaluation and characterization of adnexal masses, with subsequent management determined by imaging features, patient age, and risk factors for malignancy. 1, 2

Initial Evaluation

  • Imaging approach:

    • Transvaginal ultrasound is the primary diagnostic tool with >90% sensitivity 1
    • Transabdominal ultrasound should complement transvaginal imaging, especially for large masses (>10 cm) or those not optimally visualized transvaginally 1, 2
    • Color or power Doppler should be included to evaluate vascularity of solid components 1
  • Ultrasound risk stratification systems:

    • International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) simple rules
    • Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS)
    • Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound (SRU) consensus statement 1

Characterization of Adnexal Masses

Benign Features

  • Simple cysts (anechoic, unilocular with smooth thin wall)
  • Single thin septation <3 mm
  • Specific patterns for:
    • Dermoid/teratoma (echogenic components with distal shadowing)
    • Endometrioma (low-level internal echoes)
    • Hemorrhagic cyst (hypoechoic internal debris)
    • Pedunculated fibroid (blood supply from uterine vessels) 1, 2

Suspicious Features

  • Solid components with irregular contours
  • Thick septations (>3 mm)
  • Papillary projections or mural nodules
  • Increased vascularity in solid components
  • Presence of ascites
  • Bilateral masses 1, 2

Management Algorithm

Premenopausal Women

  1. Simple cysts:

    • <5 cm: No follow-up required
    • 5-7 cm: Follow-up ultrasound in 8-12 weeks 2
  2. Benign-appearing complex masses:

    • <5 cm: Follow-up ultrasound in 8-12 weeks
    • 5-10 cm: Consider MRI with contrast or follow-up ultrasound in 6-8 weeks 1
  3. Suspicious masses:

    • Any size: Refer to gynecologic oncologist
    • 10 cm: Refer to gynecologic oncologist regardless of appearance 1, 2

Postmenopausal Women

  1. Simple cysts:

    • <1 cm: No follow-up required
    • 1-7 cm: Follow-up ultrasound in 8-12 weeks 1, 2
  2. Complex masses:

    • Any size: Consider MRI with contrast for further characterization
    • If suspicious features: Refer to gynecologic oncologist 1
  3. All solid masses: Refer to gynecologic oncologist 1

Advanced Imaging

When ultrasound findings are indeterminate:

  • MRI with contrast:

    • Superior to both ultrasound and non-contrast MRI for confirming enhancing tissue components
    • Particularly useful for characterizing indeterminate adnexal masses
    • Can determine organ of origin (uterine, ovarian, or tubal) 1, 2
  • CT abdomen and pelvis with IV contrast:

    • Not recommended for initial characterization due to poor soft-tissue discrimination
    • Appropriate for staging if malignancy is suspected 1
  • FDG-PET/CT:

    • May be useful to identify other sites of disease in patients with suspected malignancy 1

Special Populations

Pregnant Women

  • Ultrasound remains first-line imaging
  • Most adnexal masses in pregnancy are benign (dermoid 32%, endometrioma 15%, functional cyst 12%)
  • Only 2% of surgically managed adnexal masses during pregnancy are malignant 1
  • Management is generally conservative unless suspicious features are present

Critical Considerations

  • Initial management by a gynecologic oncologist is a key prognostic factor in ovarian cancer survival 1
  • Only 33% of women with eventual diagnosis of ovarian cancer are appropriately referred to gynecologic oncologists initially 1
  • Surgical exploration of benign lesions carries complication rates of 3-15%, emphasizing the importance of accurate preoperative characterization 1
  • Contrast-enhanced MRI has demonstrated higher accuracy (94%) than conventional ultrasound (83%) for differentiating benign from malignant lesions 1

Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Relying solely on CA-125 for diagnosis (performs worse than ultrasound alone)
  • Misdiagnosing pedunculated fibroids as ovarian masses
  • Delaying referral for suspicious masses
  • Failing to recognize that small, complex masses can be malignant 1, 2

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Adnexal Mass Management

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.