Zosyn (Piperacillin/Tazobactam) Coverage for Enterococcus
Zosyn (piperacillin/tazobactam) has limited activity against enterococci, with good coverage only for Enterococcus faecalis but not for Enterococcus faecium or other resistant enterococcal species.
Enterococcal Coverage Specifics
Enterococcus faecalis
- Zosyn generally provides adequate coverage against E. faecalis, particularly beta-lactamase-producing strains 1
- Tazobactam (the beta-lactamase inhibitor in Zosyn) successfully reverses the inoculum effect seen with beta-lactamase-producing E. faecalis 1
- Time-kill studies have demonstrated bactericidal activity against beta-lactamase-producing E. faecalis when piperacillin is combined with tazobactam 1
Enterococcus faecium
- Zosyn has poor activity against E. faecium 2
- E. faecium is specifically listed as a resistant organism to piperacillin/tazobactam in drug evaluations 2
- Clinical guidelines do not recommend Zosyn for infections where E. faecium is suspected or confirmed
Clinical Implications
For Empiric Therapy
- When enterococcal coverage is needed and the species is unknown, Zosyn alone is insufficient due to its poor activity against E. faecium
- For serious infections where enterococcal coverage is critical (such as endocarditis), guidelines recommend:
For Confirmed Enterococcal Infections
- For E. faecalis: Zosyn may be effective, especially for beta-lactamase-producing strains 1
- For E. faecium: Alternative therapy is required, such as:
Special Considerations
Combination Therapy
- For serious enterococcal infections, Zosyn alone is generally insufficient
- When used for enterococcal infections, Zosyn may be more effective when combined with an aminoglycoside (if not high-level aminoglycoside resistant) 1
- In a study of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, the combination of Zosyn plus linezolid showed fewer treatment failures than Zosyn alone, suggesting benefit when covering for resistant Gram-positive organisms including E. faecium 4
Resistance Patterns
- Surveillance data shows that while E. faecalis generally remains susceptible to Zosyn (96% susceptibility in one large study), resistance rates are increasing 5
- The prevalence of E. faecium, which is inherently resistant to Zosyn, has increased in hospital settings 5
Clinical Decision Algorithm
If treating empirically and enterococcal infection is suspected:
- If low risk for E. faecium: Zosyn may provide adequate coverage
- If high risk for E. faecium (e.g., healthcare-associated infection, prior antibiotics): Add agent with E. faecium activity
If enterococcal species is known:
- E. faecalis: Zosyn is generally appropriate
- E. faecium: Choose alternative therapy (vancomycin, linezolid, or daptomycin)
For serious enterococcal infections (e.g., endocarditis, bacteremia):
In summary, while Zosyn provides reasonable coverage against E. faecalis, it should not be relied upon for coverage of E. faecium or for serious enterococcal infections where more specific and proven regimens are recommended by clinical guidelines.