What are the management approaches for different types of pulmonary embolism (PE)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 23, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Management Approaches for Different Types of Pulmonary Embolism

Pulmonary embolism (PE) should be managed according to risk stratification, with high-risk (massive) PE requiring immediate thrombolysis, intermediate-risk PE requiring hospitalization with anticoagulation and monitoring, and low-risk PE potentially managed as outpatients with direct oral anticoagulants. 1

Risk Stratification of PE

High-Risk (Massive) PE

  • Characterized by:
    • Hemodynamic instability (systolic BP <100 mmHg)
    • Shock or hypotension
    • Signs of right ventricular dysfunction on echocardiography
    • Requires immediate intervention 2, 1

Intermediate-Risk (Submassive) PE

  • Characterized by:
    • Normotensive but with evidence of right heart dysfunction (by biomarkers or imaging)
    • At risk for decompensation (~10% will deteriorate) 3
    • Further stratified into intermediate-high and intermediate-low risk based on both RV dysfunction and elevated cardiac biomarkers 1

Low-Risk PE

  • Characterized by:
    • Hemodynamically stable
    • No evidence of right heart dysfunction
    • Low PESI (Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index) or simplified PESI score 1

Management Approaches

High-Risk (Massive) PE Management

  1. Immediate thrombolysis:

    • First-line treatment for massive PE with hemodynamic instability 1
    • 50 mg bolus of alteplase is recommended in case of cardiac arrest 2, 1
    • Contraindications to thrombolysis should be ignored in life-threatening situations 1
  2. Alternative interventions (if thrombolysis contraindicated or failed):

    • Surgical embolectomy - particularly effective for massive/submassive PE with 94.5% survival reported in follow-up studies 4
    • Catheter-directed interventions:
      • Catheter-directed thrombolysis
      • Ultrasound-assisted thrombolysis
      • Mechanical thrombectomy 3, 5
  3. Diagnostic approach:

    • Echocardiography is the most useful initial test in unstable patients 2
    • CT pulmonary angiography when patient is stabilized 2

Intermediate-Risk (Submassive) PE Management

  1. Anticoagulation therapy:

    • Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are first-line treatment 1
    • Options include:
      • Apixaban: 10 mg twice daily for 7 days, then 5 mg twice daily
      • Rivaroxaban: 15 mg twice daily for 21 days, then 20 mg once daily 1, 6
      • Dabigatran: 150 mg twice daily after initial LMWH
      • Edoxaban: 60 mg once daily (30 mg if CrCl 30-50 mL/min or weight <60 kg) 1
  2. Hospital admission and monitoring:

    • Close monitoring for signs of clinical deterioration
    • Consider rescue thrombolysis if decompensation occurs 3, 5
  3. Pulmonary Embolism Response Team (PERT):

    • Multidisciplinary approach for complex cases
    • Helps determine optimal intervention strategy 3, 5

Low-Risk PE Management

  1. Outpatient management if all criteria met:

    • No hemodynamic instability
    • No need for thrombolysis
    • Oxygen saturation >90% on room air
    • No severe pain requiring IV analgesia
    • No high bleeding risk
    • No severe renal/liver disease
    • Adequate social support and follow-up 2, 1
  2. Anticoagulation therapy:

    • DOACs preferred (same dosing as intermediate-risk) 1, 6
    • If DOACs contraindicated, LMWH or fondaparinux preferred over UFH 1

Special Populations

Cancer Patients

  • LMWH recommended for at least 6 months
  • Continue anticoagulation while cancer is active 1

Pregnant Patients

  • LMWH is treatment of choice
  • DOACs and vitamin K antagonists contraindicated 1

Antiphospholipid Syndrome

  • Vitamin K antagonists recommended, not DOACs
  • Indefinite treatment recommended 1

Duration of Anticoagulation

  • Secondary PE (transient/reversible risk factors): 3 months
  • Unprovoked PE or persistent risk factors: Extended (>3 months)
  • Recurrent PE: Indefinite 1

Follow-up Care

  • Clinical follow-up at 3-6 months to assess:
    • Medication adherence
    • Bleeding complications
    • Signs of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH)
    • Need for extended anticoagulation 1, 7

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  1. Failure to risk-stratify properly:

    • Inappropriate discharge of intermediate-risk patients
    • Unnecessary thrombolysis in low-risk patients
  2. Premature discontinuation of anticoagulation:

    • Increases risk of thrombotic events 6
    • Consider coverage with another anticoagulant if XARELTO is discontinued for reasons other than bleeding
  3. Inadequate follow-up:

    • Missing development of CTEPH
    • Failing to reassess duration of anticoagulation 1, 7
  4. Inappropriate management of special populations:

    • Using DOACs in pregnant patients or those with antiphospholipid syndrome 1

The management of PE has evolved significantly with the introduction of DOACs and the development of multidisciplinary PERT teams, allowing for more personalized and effective treatment approaches based on risk stratification.

References

Guideline

Pulmonary Embolism Management

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Interventional Treatment of Pulmonary Embolism.

Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions, 2017

Research

Pulmonary embolus.

Australian journal of general practice, 2022

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.