What are the key outcomes of the CARMELINA trial regarding linagliptin (Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor) in patients with type 2 diabetes and impaired renal function?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 23, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Key Outcomes of the CARMELINA Trial for Linagliptin in Type 2 Diabetes with Impaired Renal Function

The CARMELINA trial demonstrated that linagliptin is cardiovascular and renally safe in patients with type 2 diabetes and impaired renal function, showing no increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events compared to placebo (HR 0.98; 95% CI 0.84-1.14) and no worsening of kidney outcomes (HR 1.04; 95% CI 0.89-1.22). 1

Primary Cardiovascular Outcomes

The CARMELINA trial was specifically designed to evaluate linagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes who had high cardiovascular and renal risk. Key findings include:

  • Primary 3-point MACE outcome (cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or non-fatal stroke): HR 0.98 (95% CI 0.84-1.14), demonstrating cardiovascular safety 1, 2
  • Cardiovascular death: HR 1.00 (95% CI 0.81-1.24), showing no increase in mortality 1
  • Myocardial infarction: HR 1.03 (95% CI 0.82-1.29) 1
  • Stroke: HR 0.86 (95% CI 0.66-1.12) 1

Renal Outcomes

The trial included important renal endpoints, particularly relevant given the study population:

  • Key secondary kidney composite outcome (renal death, end-stage kidney disease, or sustained ≥40% decrease in eGFR): HR 1.04 (95% CI 0.89-1.22), showing no adverse impact on kidney function 2
  • Progression of albuminuria: Reduced with linagliptin compared to placebo (HR 0.86; 95% CI 0.78-0.95) 3, 4
  • Consistent renal safety across all eGFR categories, including patients with severely reduced kidney function 4

Heart Failure Outcomes

  • Hospitalization for heart failure: HR 1.21 (95% CI 0.92-1.59), showing no statistically significant increase 1
  • Unlike saxagliptin in the SAVOR-TIMI 53 trial which showed increased heart failure hospitalization risk, linagliptin did not demonstrate this safety concern 1

Study Population Characteristics

CARMELINA specifically targeted patients with high cardiorenal risk:

  • Mean age: 65.8 years 5
  • Mean eGFR: 54.6 mL/min/1.73 m² 2
  • Albuminuria: Present in 80.1% of participants 2
  • Chronic kidney disease: 73.8% of participants had prevalent kidney disease (defined as eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m² or macroalbuminuria) 5
  • Established cardiovascular disease: 57.2% of participants 5
  • Median follow-up: 2.2 years 1

Glycemic Control and Safety

  • HbA1c reduction: Linagliptin effectively reduced HbA1c compared to placebo across all eGFR categories 4
  • Hypoglycemia: No increased risk of hypoglycemia compared to placebo 3, 2
  • Pancreatitis: Low incidence with 9 events (0.3%) in the linagliptin group vs 5 events (0.1%) with placebo 2

Clinical Implications

  1. Cardiovascular safety: Unlike some cardiovascular outcome trials that have shown benefits with SGLT2 inhibitors, linagliptin demonstrated cardiovascular neutrality (neither harm nor benefit) 1

  2. Renal function: Linagliptin can be safely used across all stages of kidney function without dose adjustment, making it particularly valuable for patients with impaired renal function 6, 4

  3. Comparison to other DPP-4 inhibitors: All DPP-4 inhibitors tested in cardiovascular outcome trials (linagliptin, saxagliptin, sitagliptin, alogliptin) have shown cardiovascular safety, but linagliptin specifically included a higher proportion of patients with kidney disease 1

  4. Positioning in therapy: For patients with type 2 diabetes and established cardiovascular disease or chronic kidney disease, SGLT2 inhibitors with proven cardiovascular benefits are recommended as first-line agents for risk reduction 1. Linagliptin represents a safe alternative when SGLT2 inhibitors cannot be used.

Limitations

  • The trial was designed to demonstrate non-inferiority (safety) rather than superiority (benefit)
  • The median follow-up of 2.2 years may be insufficient to detect long-term effects
  • The trial did not show cardiovascular or renal benefits, unlike some SGLT2 inhibitor and GLP-1 receptor agonist trials

In conclusion, CARMELINA established linagliptin as a cardiovascularly and renally safe option for patients with type 2 diabetes and impaired renal function, without demonstrating specific cardiovascular or renal protective benefits beyond glycemic control.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.