Will Lutetium-177 (LU-177) PSMA-targeted radioligand therapy reduce prostate cancer that expresses Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 23, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Lutetium-177 PSMA Therapy for PSMA-Expressing Prostate Cancer

Lutetium-177 (Lu-177) PSMA therapy is highly effective for reducing prostate cancer that expresses PSMA, with significant improvement in overall survival (15.3 vs 11.3 months) and progression-free survival (8.7 vs 3.4 months) compared to standard of care alone. 1, 2, 3

Patient Selection Criteria

Lu-177 PSMA therapy is indicated for patients with:

  • Confirmed metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)
  • High PSMA expression confirmed by PET imaging
  • At least one PSMA-positive metastatic lesion
  • No dominant PSMA-negative metastatic lesions
  • Previous treatment with:
    • At least one androgen receptor-directed therapy
    • One or two taxane-based chemotherapy regimens 1, 2

PSMA-negative lesions are defined as metastatic disease lacking PSMA uptake, including:

  • Bone with soft tissue components ≥1.0 cm
  • Lymph nodes ≥2.5 cm in short axis
  • Solid organ metastases ≥1.0 cm in size 1

Treatment Protocol

  • Standard dosage: 7.4 GBq (200 mCi) administered intravenously
  • Treatment frequency: Every 6 weeks
  • Treatment duration: 4-6 cycles 1, 2, 3

Efficacy

Lu-177 PSMA therapy demonstrates significant clinical benefits:

Outcome Lu-177 PSMA + Standard Care Standard Care Alone Hazard Ratio p-value
Median Overall Survival 15.3 months 11.3 months 0.62 <0.001
Median Progression-Free Survival 8.7 months 3.4 months 0.40 <0.001

Additional efficacy metrics:

  • PSA response rate (≥50% decline): 56-57% of patients 2, 3, 4
  • Objective response in measurable disease: 82% of patients 5
  • Disease control rate: Significantly higher with Lu-177 PSMA 3

Safety Profile

Common adverse events include:

  • Hematological toxicities:

    • Grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia: 13% of patients
    • Anemia, lymphopenia also reported 1, 2, 5
  • Non-hematological toxicities:

    • Dry mouth (87% grade 1)
    • Fatigue (50% grade 1-2)
    • Nausea (50% grade 1-2) 2, 5

The incidence of grade ≥3 adverse events is higher with Lu-177 PSMA than standard care alone (52.7% vs 38.0%), but quality of life is not adversely affected 3.

Monitoring Recommendations

  • Regular assessment of hematological parameters before each cycle
  • PSA monitoring (evaluate response no earlier than 12 weeks after treatment initiation)
  • Follow-up imaging to assess response 2

Clinical Considerations and Caveats

  1. Patient selection is critical: Proper PSMA PET imaging is essential to confirm PSMA expression and rule out PSMA-negative lesions 1, 2

  2. Predictors of better response:

    • Predominantly lymph node metastatic disease
    • Chemotherapy-naïve status
    • Lower baseline PSA levels 4
  3. Imaging options: While FDA approved Ga-68 PSMA-11 for use with Lu-177 PSMA therapy, F-18 piflufolastat PSMA and F-18 flotufolastat PSMA can also be used due to equivalency reports 1

  4. Emerging evidence: Early research suggests potential application in hormone-sensitive metastatic prostate cancer, though this remains investigational 6

  5. Avoid combination with abiraterone: The ERA 223 trial showed increased fracture risk when radium-223 (another radiopharmaceutical) was combined with abiraterone 1

Lu-177 PSMA therapy represents a significant advancement for patients with PSMA-expressing metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer who have progressed after conventional treatments, offering meaningful survival benefits with manageable toxicity.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.