What is the comparative efficacy of Imipenem (Imipenem) with EDTA (Ethylene Diamine Tetraacetic Acid) versus Ceftazidime (Ceftazidime) with Avibactam (Avibactam) for treating Multidrug-Resistant (MDR) Acinetobacter infections?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: March 18, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Research

For multidrug-resistant (MDR) Acinetobacter infections, imipenem-EDTA is generally preferred over ceftazidime-avibactam due to its ability to overcome certain resistance mechanisms in Acinetobacter, as supported by the most recent study 1. Imipenem-EDTA typically combines imipenem (500mg IV every 6 hours) with EDTA as a beta-lactamase inhibitor that helps overcome certain resistance mechanisms in Acinetobacter. Ceftazidime-avibactam (2.5g IV every 8 hours), while effective against many gram-negative pathogens, has limited activity against MDR Acinetobacter because avibactam does not inhibit the metallo-beta-lactamases (MBLs) commonly produced by this organism. When treating MDR Acinetobacter, combination therapy is often necessary, potentially adding colistin (loading dose of 9 million units, then 4.5 million units IV every 12 hours, adjusted for renal function) or tigecycline. Some key points to consider when treating MDR Acinetobacter infections include:

  • Treatment duration typically ranges from 7-14 days depending on infection site and clinical response.
  • Susceptibility testing is crucial before initiating therapy as resistance patterns vary significantly between institutions.
  • Monitoring for seizures with imipenem and renal function with both agents is essential, with dose adjustments required for patients with renal impairment. The most recent study 1 suggests that ceftazidime/avibactam may be more suitable than ceftazidime for polymyxin B based combination therapy against CR-A. baumannii, as it has a higher synergistic rate with polymyxin B, and the antibacterial activity of ceftazidime/avibactam is much higher than that of ceftazidime when tested in combination with polymyxin B. However, imipenem-EDTA remains the preferred treatment option due to its established efficacy and safety profile, as supported by earlier studies 2, 3, 4, 5.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.