What scale is used to evaluate the risk of atrial fibrillation?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 25, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Scales for Evaluating Risk of Atrial Fibrillation

The CHA₂DS₂-VASc score is the recommended scale for evaluating stroke risk in patients with atrial fibrillation, as endorsed by the American College of Cardiology, American Heart Association, and European Society of Cardiology guidelines. 1, 2

CHA₂DS₂-VASc Score Components

The CHA₂DS₂-VASc score assigns points for the following risk factors:

Risk Factor Points
Congestive heart failure 1
Hypertension 1
Age ≥75 years 2
Diabetes mellitus 1
Stroke/TIA/thromboembolism (previous) 2
Vascular disease (prior MI, PAD, aortic plaque) 1
Age 65-74 years 1
Sex category (female) 1

Total possible score ranges from 0-9 points, with higher scores indicating greater stroke risk.

Clinical Application of CHA₂DS₂-VASc

  • The CHA₂DS₂-VASc score has replaced the older CHADS₂ score in current guidelines due to its superior ability to identify truly low-risk patients 1
  • According to the 2023 ACC/AHA guidelines, the CHA₂DS₂-VASc score should be documented for all patients with atrial fibrillation 1
  • The score helps determine which patients would benefit from anticoagulation therapy:
    • Score of 0 in males or 1 in females: Low risk, no anticoagulation recommended
    • Score of 1 in males or 2 in females: Consider oral anticoagulation
    • Score ≥2 in males or ≥3 in females: Oral anticoagulation strongly recommended 2

Stroke Risk Stratification Based on CHA₂DS₂-VASc Score

Annual stroke risk increases with higher CHA₂DS₂-VASc scores:

  • Score of 0: 0.04-0.3% annual stroke risk
  • Score of 1: 0.5-1.3% annual stroke risk
  • Score of 2: 0.8-2.2% annual stroke risk
  • Score of 3: 1.7-3.7% annual stroke risk
  • Score of 4: 2.8-4.0% annual stroke risk
  • Score of 5: 4.0-6.7% annual stroke risk
  • Score ≥6: 4.8-8.4% annual stroke risk 1, 2

Complementary Risk Assessment: HAS-BLED Score

When evaluating patients with atrial fibrillation, the HAS-BLED score should also be calculated to assess bleeding risk:

Risk Factor Points
Hypertension (>160 mmHg) 1
Abnormal renal or liver function 1 or 2
Previous stroke 1
Bleeding predisposition 1
Labile INR 1
Age >65 years 1
Medications or alcohol 1 or 2

A HAS-BLED score ≥3 indicates high bleeding risk requiring caution and regular review 2.

Limitations and Considerations

  • The CHA₂DS₂-VASc score has modest predictive accuracy with C-statistics typically between 0.64-0.70 1, 3
  • There is significant heterogeneity in stroke risk predictions across different populations and clinical settings 3
  • Hospital-based studies tend to show higher stroke risks for each score point compared to community-based studies 3
  • The score should be reassessed periodically as risk factors may develop over time 2

Additional Risk Factors Not Included in CHA₂DS₂-VASc

Several factors may increase stroke risk but are not included in the CHA₂DS₂-VASc score:

  • Higher AF burden/longer duration
  • Persistent/permanent AF versus paroxysmal
  • Obesity (BMI ≥30 kg/m²)
  • Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
  • Poorly controlled hypertension
  • Reduced renal function (eGFR <45 mL/h)
  • Proteinuria
  • Enlarged left atrial volume 1

The CHA₂DS₂-VASc score has also shown utility in predicting new-onset atrial fibrillation in patients without pre-existing AF, with a hazard ratio of 1.57 for each 1-point increase in score 4.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Anticoagulation Management in Atrial Fibrillation

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.