What is CHADVASc (Congestive Heart Failure, Hypertension, Age, Diabetes, Stroke, Vascular disease, Age, Sex category)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 13, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

What is CHA₂DS₂-VASc?

CHA₂DS₂-VASc is a validated risk stratification scoring system used to assess stroke risk in patients with atrial fibrillation and guide decisions about anticoagulation therapy. 1

Components of the CHA₂DS₂-VASc Score

The CHA₂DS₂-VASc score consists of the following components, with points assigned for each risk factor:

  • C: Congestive heart failure (1 point) - Signs and symptoms of right or left ventricular failure with objective evidence of cardiac dysfunction 1
  • H: Hypertension (1 point) - Blood pressure >140/90 mmHg or current antihypertensive treatment 1
  • A₂: Age ≥75 years (2 points) - Age is a major risk factor for stroke 1
  • D: Diabetes mellitus (1 point) - Fasting glucose ≥126 mg/dL or treatment with hypoglycemic agents 1
  • S₂: Prior Stroke, TIA, or thromboembolism (2 points) - History of these events significantly increases risk 1
  • V: Vascular disease (1 point) - Prior myocardial infarction, peripheral artery disease, or aortic plaque 1
  • A: Age 65-74 years (1 point) - Moderate increase in stroke risk 1
  • Sc: Sex category - female (1 point) - Female sex is an independent risk factor 1

Clinical Application

  • The CHA₂DS₂-VASc score ranges from 0 to 9 points, with higher scores indicating greater stroke risk 1
  • For each 1-point increase in score, there is a corresponding increase in annual stroke risk 1
  • A score of 0 corresponds to a truly low risk (0% annual stroke risk) 1
  • A score of 1 corresponds to a low-moderate risk (1.3% annual stroke risk) 1
  • A score of 2 corresponds to a moderate risk (2.2% annual stroke risk) 1, 2
  • Scores ≥2 generally indicate the need for oral anticoagulation therapy 1, 2

Advantages Over Previous Scoring Systems

  • The CHA₂DS₂-VASc score has largely replaced the older CHADS₂ score in clinical practice 1
  • It provides better discrimination of truly low-risk patients than the CHADS₂ score 1, 3
  • It has a broader score range (0-9) compared to CHADS₂ (0-6), allowing for more refined risk stratification 1
  • It includes additional risk factors (vascular disease, age 65-74, female sex) not captured in CHADS₂ 1
  • The C-statistic for CHA₂DS₂-VASc (0.606) is superior to that of CHADS₂ (0.561), indicating better predictive ability 1

Clinical Decision-Making

  • For patients with a CHA₂DS₂-VASc score ≥2 (men) or ≥3 (women), oral anticoagulation is recommended 2
  • For patients with a score of 0, anticoagulation is generally not recommended 1, 2
  • For patients with a score of 1, anticoagulation decisions may be individualized based on bleeding risk and patient preferences 3
  • The score helps identify patients who will benefit most from anticoagulation therapy to prevent stroke 1, 2

Limitations and Considerations

  • While useful for risk stratification, the CHA₂DS₂-VASc score has only modest predictive accuracy (C-statistic around 0.6-0.7) 4
  • The score does not account for bleeding risk, which should be assessed separately using tools like HAS-BLED 1, 2
  • Some risk factors within the score may carry different weights in different populations 5
  • The score has been validated primarily in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation 6, 7

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.