What are the differences between norepinephrine (norepinephrine), epinephrine (epinephrine), and dopamine (dopamine) in treating hypotension and septic shock?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 26, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Differences Between Norepinephrine, Epinephrine, and Dopamine in Treating Hypotension and Septic Shock

Norepinephrine is the first-choice vasopressor for treating hypotension and septic shock due to its superior safety profile and mortality benefit compared to dopamine, while epinephrine should be reserved as a second-line agent when additional pressure support is needed. 1, 2

Pharmacologic Differences and Receptor Activity

Vasopressor Primary Receptor Activity Hemodynamic Effects Initial Dosing
Norepinephrine Predominantly α-adrenergic with some β1 activity Increases MAP via vasoconstriction with minimal change in heart rate 0.05-0.1 μg/kg/min
Epinephrine Strong α and β (β1 and β2) adrenergic effects Increases MAP, cardiac output, heart rate, and may cause more tachyarrhythmias Used as second-line agent
Dopamine Dose-dependent: Low dose (dopaminergic), Medium dose (β1), High dose (α) Increases MAP and cardiac output primarily through increased stroke volume and heart rate Only for selected patients with low risk of arrhythmias

Evidence-Based Recommendations

First-Line Therapy: Norepinephrine

  • Norepinephrine is recommended as the first-choice vasopressor in septic shock (Grade 1B recommendation) 1, 2
  • Compared to dopamine, norepinephrine is associated with:
    • Decreased all-cause mortality (RR 0.91,95% CI 0.83-0.98) 3
    • Significantly lower risk of cardiac arrhythmias (RR 0.43,95% CI 0.26-0.69) 4
    • Better hemodynamic profile including improved central venous pressure, urinary output, and blood lactate levels 3

Second-Line Options

  • Epinephrine is recommended when an additional agent is needed to maintain adequate blood pressure (Grade 2B) 1
  • Vasopressin (up to 0.03 U/min) can be added to norepinephrine to raise MAP or decrease norepinephrine dosage 1

Limited Role for Dopamine

  • Dopamine should only be considered as an alternative to norepinephrine in highly selected patients with:
    • Low risk of tachyarrhythmias
    • Absolute or relative bradycardia (Grade 2C) 1
  • The use of dopamine has fallen significantly due to its adverse effect profile 5

Clinical Application Algorithm

  1. Initial Management:

    • Begin with adequate fluid resuscitation as the foundation of hemodynamic management
    • Start norepinephrine early (0.05-0.1 μg/kg/min) if severe shock with low diastolic pressure is present
    • Titrate by 0.05-0.1 μg/kg/min every 5-15 minutes to achieve target MAP ≥65 mmHg 2
  2. If target MAP not achieved with norepinephrine alone:

    • Add epinephrine as a second agent 1
    • OR add vasopressin (up to 0.03 U/min) 1
  3. Special Considerations:

    • For patients with cardiac dysfunction or persistent hypoperfusion despite adequate blood pressure, consider adding dobutamine (2.5-20 μg/kg/min) 2
    • In pediatric septic shock, epinephrine may be more effective than dopamine for resolution of shock in the first hour 2

Monitoring During Vasopressor Therapy

  • Closely monitor:
    • Blood pressure
    • Heart rate
    • Urine output (target ≥0.5 ml/kg/h)
    • Skin perfusion
    • Mental status
    • Lactate clearance
    • Renal and liver function 2

Potential Adverse Effects

  • Norepinephrine: Excessive vasoconstriction, tissue ischemia (less common than with dopamine)
  • Epinephrine: Tachycardia, tachyarrhythmias, hyperglycemia, hyperlactatemia
  • Dopamine: Higher risk of cardiac arrhythmias, potential splanchnic vasoconstriction at higher doses 5, 4

Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Delaying norepinephrine initiation in severe shock - early administration improves cardiac output, enhances microcirculation, and avoids fluid overload 6
  • Using dopamine as first-line therapy in patients at risk for arrhythmias
  • Failing to individualize MAP targets (consider higher targets in patients with chronic hypertension) 6
  • Using vasopressin as a single initial vasopressor (not recommended) 1
  • Using phenylephrine in septic shock except in specific circumstances 1

Recent evidence strongly supports norepinephrine as the vasopressor of choice in septic shock due to its favorable mortality profile and lower incidence of adverse effects compared to alternatives, particularly dopamine.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Vasopressor Use in Critical Care

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Vasopressor Therapy in the Intensive Care Unit.

Seminars in respiratory and critical care medicine, 2021

Research

Norepinephrine in septic shock: when and how much?

Current opinion in critical care, 2017

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.