What is the scoring system for assessing Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) risk in pregnant women and how is management guided by the score?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 27, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

VTE Risk Assessment and Management in Pregnant Women

The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (RCOG) risk scoring system is the most validated approach for assessing VTE risk in pregnant women, with management guided by specific score thresholds that determine the need for prophylactic anticoagulation. 1

Risk Scoring System for Pregnant Women

RCOG Weighted Risk Assessment Model

The RCOG risk assessment model assigns weighted scores to various risk factors:

Pre-existing Risk Factors:

  • Previous VTE (except a single event related to major surgery): 4 points
  • Previous unprovoked/estrogen-related VTE: 3 points
  • Known high-risk thrombophilia: 3 points
  • Medical comorbidities (heart/lung disease, SLE, cancer, inflammatory conditions): 3 points
  • Family history of unprovoked/estrogen-related VTE in first-degree relative: 1 point
  • Known low-risk thrombophilia: 1 point
  • Age >35 years: 1 point
  • BMI >30 kg/m²: 1 point
  • Parity ≥3: 1 point
  • Smoker: 1 point
  • Gross varicose veins: 1 point

Obstetric Risk Factors:

  • Pre-eclampsia: 1 point
  • Cesarean section in labor: 2 points
  • Elective cesarean section: 1 point
  • Mid-cavity/rotational forceps delivery: 1 point
  • Prolonged labor (>24 hours): 1 point
  • Postpartum hemorrhage (>1L or transfusion): 1 point
  • Preterm birth <37 weeks: 1 point
  • Stillbirth: 1 point

Transient Risk Factors:

  • Surgical procedure during pregnancy or puerperium: 3 points
  • Hyperemesis: 3 points
  • Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: 4 points
  • Current systemic infection: 1 point
  • Immobility/dehydration: 1 point

Management Based on Risk Score

Antepartum Management:

  • Score ≥4: Consider thromboprophylaxis with LMWH throughout pregnancy
  • Score 3: Consider thromboprophylaxis with LMWH from 28 weeks
  • Score <3: Clinical surveillance (no pharmacological prophylaxis)

Postpartum Management:

  • Score ≥2: Thromboprophylaxis with LMWH for at least 10 days
  • Score ≥3 with additional risk factors: Extended thromboprophylaxis for 6 weeks
  • Score <2: Clinical surveillance

Special Considerations for Thrombophilia

Factor V Leiden or Prothrombin Gene Mutation (Heterozygous):

  • Antepartum: Clinical surveillance recommended unless additional risk factors present
  • Postpartum:
    • Without family history of VTE: Clinical surveillance
    • With family history of VTE: Prophylaxis for 6 weeks

Protein C Deficiency:

  • Antepartum: Clinical surveillance recommended unless additional risk factors present
  • Postpartum: Consider prophylaxis if combined with other risk factors

Evidence Quality and Limitations

The evidence supporting these recommendations is of low to moderate quality. The prediction model for postpartum VTE risk developed using UK data showed good performance characteristics (C statistic: 0.73; 95% CI, 0.71-0.75) 1, but prospective validation is limited.

Studies evaluating risk scoring systems have shown low VTE rates when prophylaxis is guided by these scores, but the absence of comparator arms makes it difficult to assess the true impact 1. A controlled before-and-after implementation study showed that risk score-driven prophylaxis reduced VTE incidence (RR = 0.30 [0.14; 0.67]) without significantly increasing bleeding risk 2.

Common Pitfalls and Caveats

  1. Inconsistent application: Different institutions may use different cutoff points for risk categories, leading to variable management decisions 3. Standardized application of the RCOG scoring system is essential.

  2. Overestimation of risk: Some scoring systems (like Caprini) may classify up to 94% of pregnant women as high risk, resulting in unnecessary anticoagulation 4.

  3. Underestimation of risk: The Padua risk assessment model may miss VTE cases in pregnant women 4.

  4. Timing of prophylaxis: Failure to recognize that VTE risk increases from conception and extends through the postpartum period 1.

  5. Monitoring requirements: When using LMWH, monitoring anti-Factor Xa levels may be necessary, with target ranges of 0.2-0.6 U/mL for prophylactic dosing 5.

The RCOG scoring system represents the most practical approach to balancing the risks of VTE against the potential harms of unnecessary anticoagulation in pregnant women. Implementation of this standardized approach has been shown to improve consistency of care and reduce VTE events without increasing hemorrhagic complications 6.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Systematic review of venous thromboembolism risk categories derived from Caprini score.

Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders, 2022

Research

Performance of Risk Assessment Models for Peripartum Thromboprophylaxis.

Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.), 2019

Guideline

Factor V Leiden Management

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.