FDA-Approved Biological Treatments for Atopic Dermatitis and Emerging Therapies
Besides dupilumab, tralokinumab is the only other FDA-approved biological treatment for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis in adults, while JAK inhibitors like upadacitinib represent emerging therapeutic options for patients who fail first-line biologics. 1, 2
FDA-Approved Biologics for Atopic Dermatitis
Tralokinumab
- Mechanism of action: Human IgG4 monoclonal antibody that specifically targets and neutralizes interleukin-13 (IL-13) 1, 3
- FDA approval status: Approved for adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis 3, 2
- Dosing regimen: 600 mg subcutaneous injection at initiation followed by 300 mg every 2 weeks 1
- Efficacy:
- Safety profile:
Dupilumab
- Mechanism of action: Monoclonal antibody targeting the interleukin-4 receptor α, blocking both IL-4 and IL-13 signaling 1, 5
- FDA approval status: First FDA-approved targeted systemic treatment for AD, approved for patients as young as 6 months old 1, 2
- Efficacy:
- Safety profile: Excellent safety record in clinical trials and few major safety concerns after more than 5 years in clinical practice 1
Emerging Therapies for Atopic Dermatitis
JAK Inhibitors
- Upadacitinib (Rinvoq):
- Mechanism: Selective JAK-1 inhibitor 6
- FDA approval status: FDA-approved for moderate-to-severe AD 6
- Place in therapy: Second-line systemic therapy after failure of other systemic therapies (including biologics) or when those therapies are inadvisable 6
- Efficacy: Higher efficacy than dupilumab at standard dosing 1
- Safety concerns: Carries important warnings for serious infections, increased mortality risk, malignancy, major adverse cardiovascular events, and thrombosis 6
Treatment Algorithm for Atopic Dermatitis
First-line therapies:
- Topical treatments and emollients 6
Second-line therapies (when topicals fail):
Third-line therapies (after failure of biologics):
Clinical Considerations
- Biologic selection: Dupilumab is generally favored as first-line systemic therapy by experts due to its established efficacy and excellent safety profile 1
- Treatment response: Response rates to tralokinumab may be higher in biologic-naive patients (67% EASI-75) compared to those previously treated with biologics or JAK inhibitors (41% EASI-75) 4
- Combination therapy: Topical agents can be used concurrently with systemic agents for maintenance, rescue, or treatment of flares 1
Important Caveats
- There are no head-to-head studies directly comparing tralokinumab against other systemic therapies 1
- JAK inhibitors should not be used as first-line therapy due to their safety profile 6
- When selecting therapy, consider patient factors such as age, comorbidities, and previous treatment responses
- Regular monitoring for adverse effects is essential, particularly with JAK inhibitors