Is a stent (small, mesh tube) always placed when clearing a coronary artery?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 29, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Stent Placement in Coronary Artery Procedures

No, stents are not always placed when clearing a coronary artery during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The decision to place a stent depends on specific clinical and anatomical factors, though stenting has become the dominant approach in modern interventional cardiology.

When Stents Are Used vs. Balloon Angioplasty Alone

Stenting as Standard Practice

  • Stent placement has largely replaced balloon angioplasty alone (also called "plain old balloon angioplasty" or POBA) as the primary approach for coronary interventions 1
  • Stents provide several advantages over balloon angioplasty alone:
    • Prevent vessel recoil and limit dissection by compressing intimal flaps
    • Provide more predictable angiographic results
    • Result in fewer vessel occlusions or reocclusions
    • Reduce restenosis rates by approximately 50%
    • Associated with lower mortality compared to balloon angioplasty alone 1

Scenarios Where Stents May Not Be Used

Despite these advantages, there are specific situations where stents might not be placed:

  1. Technical limitations:

    • Extremely tortuous vessels where stent delivery is not feasible
    • Very small vessels that cannot accommodate available stent sizes
  2. Specific clinical scenarios:

    • When balloon angioplasty alone achieves an excellent result with:
      • No significant residual stenosis
      • No vessel dissection
      • Good flow (TIMI 3)
    • In cases where the risk of stent thrombosis outweighs benefits
  3. Patient factors:

    • Inability to tolerate required dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT)
    • High bleeding risk with anticipated need for surgery within 1 year 1
    • Contraindication to long-term antiplatelet therapy

Types of Stents and Selection Criteria

Bare Metal Stents (BMS) vs. Drug-Eluting Stents (DES)

  • Drug-eluting stents are generally preferred over bare-metal stents for most patients 1, 2
  • BMS should be used when:
    • Patient has high bleeding risk
    • Patient is unable to comply with 1 year of dual antiplatelet therapy
    • Anticipated invasive or surgical procedures within 1 year 1

Duration of Antiplatelet Therapy

  • For DES: Dual antiplatelet therapy (aspirin plus P2Y12 inhibitor) is required for at least 12 months 1, 2
  • For BMS: Dual antiplatelet therapy is typically required for at least 1 month, but often extended to 12 months 1

Clinical Evidence Supporting Stent Use

  • Meta-analysis of 29 trials with 9,918 patients showed coronary stenting reduced restenosis rates and need for repeat PCI by approximately 50% compared to balloon angioplasty 1
  • Stenting is associated with reduced mortality compared to balloon angioplasty alone 1
  • The BENESTENT study demonstrated that patients receiving stents had better clinical and angiographic outcomes over 7 months compared to those receiving standard angioplasty 3

Common Pitfalls and Caveats

  • Stent thrombosis risk: DES should not be used in patients unable to tolerate or comply with prolonged DAPT due to increased risk of stent thrombosis 1
  • Restenosis: Despite stenting, restenosis can still occur, particularly with BMS
  • Bifurcation lesions: These represent 15-20% of all PCIs and require special consideration regarding stent placement strategy 2
  • Perioperative management: Patients with stents requiring surgery need careful management of antiplatelet therapy to balance bleeding and thrombosis risks 1

In summary, while stenting has become the dominant approach in coronary interventions due to superior outcomes, it is not universally required in all cases of coronary artery clearing. The decision should be based on specific clinical, anatomical, and patient factors with consideration of the risks and benefits of stent placement versus balloon angioplasty alone.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Bifurcation Lesions in Percutaneous Coronary Interventions

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.