Von Willebrand Disease Cannot Be Ruled Out Based Solely on a VWF Level of 0.824
A von Willebrand factor (VWF) level of 0.824 alone is insufficient to rule out type 2B von Willebrand disease (VWD), especially in a patient with strong family history of the condition. 1, 2
Diagnostic Approach for VWD
The diagnosis or exclusion of VWD requires more than a single VWF level measurement:
- Multiple tests are required: No single laboratory test can definitively screen for VWD 1, 2
- Initial VWD testing panel should include:
Why a Single VWF Level is Insufficient
For type 2B VWD specifically:
- The condition is characterized by qualitative defects in VWF rather than simply reduced levels
- Key diagnostic findings include:
- VWF:RCo typically <30 IU/dL
- VWF:Ag often 30-200 IU/dL (can be normal)
- VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag ratio <0.5-0.7
- Loss of high molecular weight multimers
- Enhanced ristocetin-induced platelet aggregation (RIPA) at low doses 2
Important Considerations for This Case
Family history is critical: With multiple family members confirmed to have type 2B VWD, there is high pre-test probability 3
VWF is an acute phase reactant: Levels can be falsely elevated in response to stress, inflammation, pregnancy, or other clinical conditions 1
Type 2B VWD has variable presentation: Some patients with confirmed type 2B VWD can have:
- Normal VWF:Ag levels
- Normal VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag ratios in some cases
- Even negative RIPA at standard concentrations 3
Complete VWD evaluation requires:
Recommended Next Steps
Complete the initial VWD testing panel if not already done:
- VWF:RCo (or other activity assay)
- FVIII activity
- Calculate VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag ratio
Perform specialized testing:
- VWF multimer analysis
- RIPA at both standard and low ristocetin concentrations
- VWF:CB assay
Consider repeat testing: VWF levels can vary, and testing may need to be repeated up to 3 times to ensure reliable results 1
Consult with a hematologist: Given the strong family history, consultation with a specialist in bleeding disorders is warranted 1, 2
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Relying on a single test: Diagnosis of VWD requires multiple complementary tests 1, 2
- Ignoring family history: A strong family history increases pre-test probability significantly 3
- Failing to consider VWF as an acute phase reactant: Elevated levels may mask underlying VWD 1
- Not testing for qualitative defects: Type 2 VWD often shows abnormal function despite near-normal antigen levels 2
The pathologist's conclusion that VWD is ruled out based solely on a VWF level of 0.824 is premature and potentially misleading, especially given the strong family history of type 2B VWD in this case.