What is the best imaging test for identifying Achilles tendinitis, Achilles bursitis, or Achilles tendinopathy?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 30, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Best Imaging Test for Achilles Tendon Pathology

MRI is the best imaging test for identifying Achilles tendinitis, bursitis, tendinopathy, and other issues affecting the Achilles tendon due to its high sensitivity (>90%) for detecting tendon tears and pathology.

Imaging Options for Achilles Tendon Pathology

MRI: First-Line Imaging Modality

  • Diagnostic accuracy: MRI achieves high sensitivities exceeding 90% in diagnosing ankle tendon tears 1
  • Specific for Achilles pathology: Detects 26 of 27 cases (96%) of Achilles tendinosis and partial rupture 1, 2
  • Comprehensive evaluation: Can simultaneously assess associated conditions that may mimic or accompany Achilles pathology 1
  • Recommended by guidelines: The American College of Radiology recommends MRI as the first-line imaging study for chronic ankle pain with suspected tenosynovitis 3
  • Superior sensitivity and specificity: 95% sensitivity and specificity for detecting Achilles tendon tears, degeneration, and chronic tendinopathy 3

Ultrasound: Alternative Option

  • Good diagnostic capability: Detects 21 of 26 cases (81%) of Achilles tendinosis and partial rupture 1
  • Accuracy for tears: Can differentiate full-thickness from partial-thickness Achilles tears with 92% accuracy 1
  • Dynamic assessment: Allows real-time evaluation of tendon movement and subluxation 1
  • Operator-dependent: Results are more dependent on operator skill and expertise compared to MRI 1
  • Additional benefits: Can guide therapeutic interventions such as injections or dry needling 1
  • Early detection: Can identify lesions early in the course of disease 4

Comparative Performance

MRI vs. Ultrasound

  • Detection rate comparison: MRI detected 26 of 27 cases (96%) vs. ultrasound detected 21 of 26 cases (81%) of Achilles tendinopathy 1, 2
  • Partial tears: MRI is superior to ultrasound in detection of partial tears 5
  • Postoperative assessment: MRI is more effective for postoperative evaluation 5
  • Reliability: When compared to MRI as gold standard, ultrasound showed high agreement (89%, κ = 0.74) 6
  • Clinical correlation: MRI evidence of tendon pathology should be interpreted cautiously as asymptomatic patients may have abnormal findings 1

Imaging Protocol Considerations

MRI Protocol

  • Fat suppression sequences: Essential for detecting focal lesions in the Achilles tendon 5
  • Multiple planes: Sagittal and coronal sections are particularly useful for assessing tendon integrity 5
  • Contrast enhancement: Indicated for postoperative investigations or when infection, arthritis, or tumor is suspected 5

Ultrasound Technique

  • Dynamic capability: Can assess tendon movement and function during active motion 1
  • Guided interventions: Facilitates concurrent performance of diagnostic or therapeutic injections 1
  • Critical zone focus: Special attention to the ventral part of the medial third ("critical zone") where degeneration commonly occurs 4

Clinical Applications

When to Use MRI

  • Complex cases: When multiple pathologies are suspected
  • Partial tears: When partial tendon tears are suspected
  • Postoperative evaluation: For assessment after surgical repair
  • Preoperative planning: When surgical intervention is being considered 7

When to Consider Ultrasound

  • Initial screening: As a first-line tool in resource-limited settings
  • Dynamic assessment: When tendon subluxation or dislocation is suspected 1
  • Guided interventions: When therapeutic injection is planned 1
  • Follow-up: For monitoring response to treatment

Pitfalls and Considerations

  • Normal variants: Twisted subtendons with high signal septae on MRI can mimic tears 5
  • Asymptomatic findings: Up to 34% of asymptomatic patients may have tendon abnormalities on imaging 1
  • Clinical correlation: One study showed MRI evidence of tendon pathology had only 48% positive predictive value for clinical findings 1
  • Operator dependence: Ultrasound results vary significantly based on operator expertise 1

Other Imaging Modalities

  • CT, CT arthrography, bone scan: Not routinely used for evaluation of Achilles tendon pathology 1
  • Radiography: Limited utility except for identifying bony abnormalities or calcifications 1
  • Novel MRI techniques: Diffusion tensor imaging and T2-mapping show promise for monitoring tendon healing and regeneration 5

MRI remains the gold standard for comprehensive evaluation of Achilles tendon pathology, particularly when surgical intervention is being considered or when multiple pathologies are suspected.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.