What is the threshold of squamous epithelial cells in a urinalysis that indicates sample contamination?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: March 20, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Guidelines

The presence of more than 10 squamous epithelial cells in a urinalysis indicates sample contamination. This is based on the evidence from the Annals of Emergency Medicine 1, which suggests that a urine sample with a significant number of epithelial cells must be considered contaminated.

Key Points to Consider

  • The study highlights the importance of proper collection techniques, such as clean-catch or catheterization, to minimize contamination rates 1.
  • Contamination rates for clean-catch urine samples can range from 0% to 29%, emphasizing the need for careful collection methods 1.
  • The presence of squamous epithelial cells in small numbers is considered normal, but excessive numbers suggest contamination with cells from the urethra, vagina, or external genitalia.

Clinical Implications

  • If contamination is suspected, a clean-catch midstream technique should be used for recollection, with proper cleansing of the genital area before sampling.
  • In critical situations, catheterization or suprapubic aspiration might be considered to obtain an uncontaminated specimen, given their higher sensitivity and specificity 1.

Important Considerations for Clinical Practice

  • Clinicians should be aware of the potential for contamination and take steps to minimize it, such as using proper collection techniques and considering the patient's clinical context.
  • The threshold of more than 10 squamous epithelial cells per high-power field (HPF) can serve as a guideline for identifying contaminated samples, but clinical judgment and consideration of individual patient factors are also crucial.

From the Research

Threshold of Squamous Epithelial Cells

  • The threshold of squamous epithelial cells in a urinalysis that indicates sample contamination is not universally defined, but several studies provide insights:
    • A study published in 2022 2 found that having fewer than 2 squamous epithelial cells per high power field increased the positive predictive value of referral urinalyses for true microscopic hematuria.
    • Another study from 2025 3 established cutoffs for squamous epithelial cells (SEC) as 21.35 SEC/µL for women and 5.05 SEC/µL for men to identify sample contamination or colonization scenarios.
    • A 2016 study 4 found that the presence of more than 8 SECs/low-powered field (lpf) was associated with poor predictive performance of traditional urinalysis measures, but did not provide a clear threshold for contamination.

Variability in Thresholds

  • Different studies suggest varying thresholds for squamous epithelial cells to indicate sample contamination, highlighting the need for further research to establish a standardized threshold.
  • The 2022 study 2 used a threshold of 2 squamous epithelial cells per high power field, while the 2025 study 3 used cutoffs of 21.35 SEC/µL for women and 5.05 SEC/µL for men.
  • The 2016 study 4 found that more than 8 SECs/lpf was associated with poor predictive performance, but did not provide a clear threshold for contamination.

Limitations and Considerations

  • The presence of squamous epithelial cells is not a definitive indicator of sample contamination, as it can also be present in properly collected samples 5.
  • The threshold for squamous epithelial cells may vary depending on the population being studied, the collection method, and the laboratory techniques used 6, 4, 3.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.